Skip to main content
Case studyFortune 100: 80% less compliance workRead the Story
RiskWatch

For US Federal, State + Local Agencies

Risk management software for government that gets you to ATO in months, not years.

Authorization is where projects go to stall. Your team is rewriting the same controls into a fresh spreadsheet for every assessor, guessing which ones the cloud provider already covers, and watching the package sit for over a year before anyone signs. RiskWatch runs authorization as one continuous pipeline: write each control once, see exactly what you inherit from your CSP versus what you own, and hand the assessor a machine-readable package instead of a binder. Agencies and CSPs reach authorization in months, not years. (Traditional FedRAMP runs 12-18 months; the 20x OSCAL track compresses it toward 6.)

Trusted by US federal, state, and local agencies covering DOTs, public utilities, federal research, and authorized CSPs serving government customers.

AonBoseIberdrola USAJohnson & JohnsonPfizerPuma North America
4.7G2 Crowd·120+
4.7Capterra·80+
4.6Gartner Peer Insights·60+

Why Government CISOs Pick RiskWatch

RiskWatch compresses ATO from 18 months to 6.

RiskWatch ends the authorization grind. Your team writes each control once and the platform scores it everywhere it counts, hands the assessor a machine-readable package instead of a binder, and keeps the evidence current after sign-off so reauthorization is a refresh, not a restart. The same controls cover your federal authorization, your state and local programs, your law-enforcement systems, and your contractor work, so one program scales from a federal CSP to a state DOT to a local PD. (Runs NIST 800-53 r5, FedRAMP 20x, GovRAMP, FISMA, CJIS, and IRS Pub 1075 with OSCAL-ready SSP, SAP, SAR, and POAM export.)

Hand the assessor a package, not a binder

Your evidence comes out machine-readable and stays current after sign-off, so the assessor reads it without a translation step and reauthorization is a refresh. Authorization in roughly 6 months instead of 18 when the pipeline is OSCAL-ready. (FedRAMP 20x SSP, SAP, SAR, POAM with a ConMon-ready vault.)

Stop writing controls the cloud already covers

See exactly which controls you inherit from your provider versus which ones you own, so your team writes 71 sections of the SSP instead of 323. Inheritance maps for AWS GovCloud, Azure Gov, Google Gov, and Oracle Gov apply automatically. (Roughly 44% inherited, 30% shared, 22% customer, 4% overlay.)

One program across federal, state, local, and tribal

Authorize once and reuse the work everywhere a jurisdiction asks for it, instead of standing up a separate program per regulator. (Same NIST 800-53 baseline under FedRAMP for federal, GovRAMP for state and local, CJIS for law enforcement, IRS Pub 1075 for tax data, and NIST 800-171 for contractor CUI.)

The Government Compliance Landscape

Government compliance is regulator + overlay + jurisdiction. The numbers prove it.

FedRAMP authorization timelines historically run 12-18 months. FedRAMP 20x is reshaping that with OSCAL automation. State and local agencies adopting cloud face GovRAMP plus jurisdiction-specific overlays. The same NIST 800-53 baseline drives federal civilian, state DOT, local PD, and tribal government boundaries.

323
controls in the FedRAMP Moderate baseline (NIST 800-53 r5)
12-18mo
traditional FedRAMP authorization timeline before FedRAMP 20x compression
H2 2026
FedRAMP 20x Phase 3 wide adoption (OSCAL-required pathway)
~44%
of FedRAMP Moderate controls inherited from a FedRAMP-authorized CSP

Three Domains, One Platform

Government risk lives in three concrete domains

RiskWatch covers all three. Each domain has a dedicated workflow, scoring model, and remediation queue. They share data so a single 800-53 control implementation drives FedRAMP, GovRAMP, FISMA, and CJIS evidence simultaneously.

Risk

NIST RMF Risk Management

Survey-based risk assessment across federal information systems, state agency boundaries, and CSP authorization scope, scored against ISO 31000 and the NIST RMF 6-step process.

  • FIPS 199 categorization (Categorize step)
  • Continuous authorization (ConMon) workflow
  • POAM tracking with monthly updates
Explore Risk Management
Compliance

FedRAMP + GovRAMP + FISMA

All NIST 800-53 r5 baselines (Low / Moderate / High), FedRAMP 20x OSCAL packages, GovRAMP authorization for state/local, and FISMA reporting in one library.

  • FedRAMP 20x machine-readable SSP/SAP/SAR/POAM
  • GovRAMP (StateRAMP) authorization track
  • FISMA agency reporting + ATO recommendations
Explore NIST 800-53
Security

CJIS + IRS Pub 1075 + 800-171

Overlay packages for law enforcement (CJIS), tax administration (IRS Pub 1075), and federal contractor CUI (NIST 800-171) layered on the same 800-53 baseline.

  • CJIS Security Policy compliance for LE agencies
  • IRS Pub 1075 controls for federal tax data
  • NIST 800-171 r3 + DFARS for CUI on contractor systems
Explore NIST 800-171

RMF Pipeline Spotlight

Categorize → Authorize → Monitor on one library.

Most agencies run RMF Step 1 (Categorize) in one tool, Step 3 (Implement) in another, and Step 6 (Monitor) in a third. The handoffs lose evidence. RiskWatch keeps the entire RMF lifecycle on one controls library, the same SSP that drove your initial ATO drives ConMon, and the POAM updates flow back into the next reauthorization automatically. Step-by-step time-in-step metrics surface where packages stall.

NIST RMF · 6-step ATO pipeline
FedRAMP Moderate · 323 controls · in flight
Step 3 of 6 · 3PAO review in progress · 92 days to AO target
Categorize·Week 1-2
FIPS 199 impact rating · system boundary defined
Complete
Select·Week 2-4
Control baseline picked · tailoring rationale captured
Complete
3
Implement·Month 2-6
Controls deployed · SSP authored · evidence gathered
In progress
4
Assess·Month 6-9
3PAO review · SAR + POAM produced
Pending
5
Authorize·Month 9-12
AO signs ATO based on residual risk
Pending
6
Monitor·Continuous
ConMon · monthly POAM updates · annual reauth
Pending
Authorization timeline modeled · POAM live12-18 months → 6 months with automation
Control inheritance · FedRAMP Moderate · 323 controls
44% inherited. 22% your work. Stop scoping every control as yours.
Customer responsibility matrix · per-control inheritance source
Inherited from CSP142 · 44%
AWS GovCloud / Azure Gov / Google Gov FedRAMP-authorized boundary
e.g. PE-1, PE-3, MA-2, CP-7, AC-2(a) infra portion
Shared (CSP + customer)98 · 30%
Both parties contribute · responsibility matrix documents the split
e.g. AC-2 account mgmt, AU-3 audit content, IR-4 incident handling
Customer responsibility71 · 22%
Application-layer controls · custom code, app config, business logic
e.g. AC-7 unsuccessful logon, SC-7 boundary protection (app), IA-2
Custom overlay12 · 4%
Agency-specific tailoring · CJIS, IRS Pub 1075, ITAR, etc.
e.g. Agency policy overlays · workflow-specific controls
Customer Responsibility Matrix · OSCAL-readyYour team writes 71 SSP sections, not 323.

Control Inheritance Spotlight

Stop scoping every control as customer responsibility.

Run on AWS GovCloud, Azure Government, or Google Gov and ~44% of FedRAMP Moderate's 323 controls are inherited from the CSP outright. ~30% are shared. Your team writes ~71 SSP sections, not 323. The Customer Responsibility Matrix is auto-generated and 3PAOs see exactly which controls you own. OSCAL component-definition metadata exported per FedRAMP 20x requirements.

The Coverage Gap

Most government compliance software covers one authorization track

Federal-only GRC tools handle FedRAMP. State-procurement vendors handle GovRAMP. CUI tools handle NIST 800-171. CJIS overlay tools cover law enforcement. Each does one job. Multi-jurisdiction agencies and CSPs pursuing both federal + state authorization still operate parallel programs across parallel tools.

Platform CategoryNIST 800-53 r5FedRAMP 20xGovRAMPFISMACJISOSCAL Export
Federal-Only GRC ToolsTelos Xacta, RegScaleYesPartial·Yes·Partial
Generic GRC PlatformsServiceNow GRC, ArcherPartial··Partial··
GovRAMP / StateRAMP VendorsDrata Government, Vanta FederalPartialPartialYes··Partial
CUI / NIST 800-171 ToolsHyperproof, Risk CognizancePartial··Partial··
CJIS Overlay ToolsLE-specific compliance vendors····Yes·
Spreadsheets & Email······
RiskWatchThe unified ATO platformYesYesYesYesYesYes

RiskWatch is the only platform covering all six government authorization domains: NIST 800-53 r5, FedRAMP 20x, GovRAMP, FISMA, CJIS, and OSCAL export. Federal-only tools cover FedRAMP. State vendors cover GovRAMP. CUI tools cover 800-171. CJIS overlay tools cover law enforcement. Each does one job. RiskWatch unifies all six in one survey-based assessment workflow.

How It Works

One platform. RMF 6-step pipeline across federal + state + local.

RiskWatch is a survey-based assessment platform. The work is structured around questionnaires that capture system categorization, control implementation, assessment evidence, and continuous monitoring data in a consistent format, then scored against the chosen 800-53 baseline and exported as OSCAL packages.

For government buyers, that workflow runs the full NIST RMF 6-step lifecycle continuously per authorization boundary. Categorize captures FIPS 199 impact rating. Select picks the baseline (Low / Moderate / High) and tailors. Implement deploys controls and authors the SSP. Assess produces the SAR via 3PAO review. Authorize generates the ATO recommendation. Monitor runs ConMon with monthly POAM updates.

The same platform runs all six RMF steps, surfaces stalled packages before the AO target date, assigns remediation owners, and tracks completion. Replace the spreadsheet handoffs between Step 1 (Categorize) tool, Step 3 (Implement) tool, and Step 6 (Monitor) tool that lose evidence in the gaps.

The RMF Pipeline

  1. 01
    Categorize
    FIPS 199 impact rating captured. System boundary defined. RMF Step 1.
  2. 02
    Select
    Control baseline picked (Low / Moderate / High). Tailoring rationale captured. RMF Step 2.
  3. 03
    Implement + Assess
    Controls deployed. SSP authored. 3PAO review produces SAR + POAM. RMF Steps 3-4.
  4. 04
    Authorize + Monitor
    ATO signed by AO. ConMon kicks in. Monthly POAM updates. Annual reauth. RMF Steps 5-6.
RMFOSCALConMonPOAMATO

Built For Your Role

Who uses RiskWatch in a government organization

Authorizing Official (AO)

Owns ATO sign-off, residual risk acceptance, and reauthorization decisions across the agency portfolio.

ATO packages with traceable evidence. Residual risk surfaced explicitly. AO decision documented.

ISSO / ISSM

Owns the system SSP, control implementation, 3PAO coordination, and POAM closure.

323 controls reduced to ~71 customer-owned via inheritance. SSP authoring time cut by 78%.

Agency CISO

Owns enterprise cyber posture, FISMA reporting, and the agency portfolio of authorized systems.

FISMA reporting built from the same controls that drive ATO. Portfolio risk surfaced quarterly.

FedRAMP / GovRAMP Liaison

Owns CSP authorization track, 3PAO relationship, and FedRAMP PMO interactions.

OSCAL-formatted SSP/SAP/SAR/POAM ready for FedRAMP PMO submission. FedRAMP 20x pipeline ready.

State + Local Agency Compliance Lead

Owns GovRAMP authorization, state-specific overlays, and local agency ATO coordination.

GovRAMP authorization track on the same library as FedRAMP. State-specific overlays modeled.

Federal Contractor Compliance Officer

Owns NIST 800-171 CUI compliance, DFARS clauses, and contractor system ATO support.

800-171 r3 + DFARS evidence on the same library. CMMC alignment for DoD contractor work.

Built For Your Segment

Government segments RiskWatch supports

Federal Civilian Agencies

FISMA reporting, NIST 800-53 r5 implementation, agency CIO + CISO portfolio governance, and OMB-mandated cyber posture reporting.

DoD + Federal Contractors

NIST 800-171 r3 + DFARS, CMMC Level 1-3 readiness, CUI on contractor systems, and SPRS score reporting.

Cloud Service Providers (FedRAMP)

FedRAMP 20x OSCAL-formatted packages, control inheritance from underlying CSP boundary, ConMon evidence vault, and 3PAO assessment readiness.

State + Local Government

GovRAMP authorization (StateRAMP rebrand), state-specific FISMA implementations, public-records compliance, and inter-agency data-sharing controls.

Law Enforcement Agencies

CJIS Security Policy compliance, criminal justice information protection, multi-jurisdictional data-sharing, and FBI audit readiness.

Tribal + Educational Government

Tribal sovereignty considerations, federal grant compliance, and educational FERPA + research-data controls layered on 800-53 baseline.

Standards & Frameworks

Built for the regulations US government agencies actually face

Generic GRC tools were built for office IT. RiskWatch was built for the NIST RMF and the OSCAL-machine-readable future of federal authorization.

Regulatory

NIST 800-53 r5
Federal information system security and privacy controls. Baselines: Low, Moderate, High.
FedRAMP 20x
Modernized FedRAMP authorization pathway with OSCAL automation, Phase 3 wide adoption H2 2026.
GovRAMP
State and local government authorization (rebrand of StateRAMP), 2026.
FISMA
Federal Information Security Modernization Act reporting and OMB Memo M-24 series.
CJIS Security Policy
FBI Criminal Justice Information Services Security Policy for law enforcement systems.
IRS Pub 1075
IRS safeguards for federal tax information shared with state and local agencies.

Industry

NIST 800-171 r3
CUI protection requirements for federal contractor systems (DFARS clause).
OSCAL
Open Security Controls Assessment Language, NIST machine-readable schema.
NIST RMF
Risk Management Framework 6-step process from SP 800-37 r2.
NIST CSF 2.0
Cybersecurity Framework with the GOVERN function added in 2024.
FIPS 199
Standards for security categorization of federal information and systems.
FIPS 140-3
Cryptographic module validation for federal systems.

Trusted by 500+ risk and compliance teams

Aon
Bose
The Coca-Cola Company
Iberdrola USA
Johnson & Johnson
Pfizer
Puma North America
SeaWorld Entertainment
TE Connectivity
Aon
Bose
The Coca-Cola Company
Iberdrola USA
Johnson & Johnson
Pfizer
Puma North America
SeaWorld Entertainment
TE Connectivity
Our 3PAO walked in with the SAR pre-staged. Inheritance map showed exactly which controls were ours vs the CSP's. ATO landed at month seven instead of month seventeen, and ConMon picked up where the assessment left off without a tool migration.
Robert M.
CISO, State DOT, 2,400 employees
7 moATO timeline (down from 17 mo)
↓ 78%SSP sections written (after CSP inheritance)
↑ 3×POAM closure rate (with ConMon evidence)
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

See It In Action

See how agencies and CSPs run RMF, FedRAMP 20x, and GovRAMP on one platform

Most demos run 15 minutes. Bring a recent SSP, a recent 3PAO finding, or a recent CSP inheritance question. We will show you how RiskWatch would have surfaced the gap, scored the exposure, and tracked the remediation across every authorization track at once.

Or call US: +1 (800) 360-1898

Request a Demo