Case studyFortune 100: 80% less compliance workRead the Story
RiskWatch
Updated May 14, 2026 · 10 platforms evaluated

Top 10 Risk Management Software for Logistics in 2026: A Buyer-First Comparison

Honest 2026 ranking of the 10 best risk management platforms for logistics, 3PLs, freight forwarders, and motor carriers. C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, cargo, claims.

By RiskWatch Editorial · Logistics and Supply Chain Risk Research

Verdict

TL;DR

If you run a 3PL, freight forwarder, motor carrier, ocean carrier, warehouse network, or large shipper and need one platform to cover C-TPAT, TAPA FSR / TSR / PSR, AEO, ISO 28000, supplier audits, cargo-theft prevention, FMCSA CSA driver risk, motor-truck-cargo claims, and customs compliance, RiskWatch ranks first on our weighted score for the mid-market and regional logistics buyer because C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, ISO 28000, and OSHA libraries are pre-mapped and physical-security assessment for warehouses sits in the same tenant. Riskonnect and Origami Risk are the right calls when motor-truck-cargo, auto-liability, and workers-comp claims volume drive the brief. Everstream Analytics and Resilinc are the supplier-risk specialists that cover multi-tier mapping and predictive disruption sensing where the brief is upstream supplier failure rather than carrier-side compliance. OnSolve / Crisis24 wins when duty-of-care, traveler tracking, and critical-event mass notification are the load-bearing requirements. Pick by C-TPAT and TAPA examiner-defensibility, cargo-claims integration with carriers, and pricing transparency, not by analyst-quadrant placement, because nine of the ten vendors here will not publish a price.

Pick by use case

Where each platform fits

Mid-market 3PL, freight forwarder, or motor carrier running C-TPAT + TAPA + AEO + ISO 28000
RiskWatch: Pre-mapped C-TPAT, TAPA FSR / TSR, AEO, ISO 28000, OSHA, and PCI libraries; physical-security assessment for warehouses and yards in the same tenant; single-tenant deployment for customs-broker data residency.
Large carrier or shipper running motor-truck-cargo, GL, and auto-liability claims at scale
Riskonnect: Deepest claims module (motor-truck-cargo, GL, auto, workers comp, property); Salesforce-native data model; 2,700+ enterprise customers; 2026 Redhand RMIS Report featured.
Transportation operator running DOT / FMCSA CSA driver risk plus claims plus safety
Origami Risk: Dedicated transportation industry vertical with driver-safety + claims + EHS + DOT compliance modules; configurable RMIS; 2026 Redhand RMIS Report featured.
Global manufacturer or shipper needing supplier ESG, LCA, and scope-3 across logistics tiers
Sphera (SupplyShift): SupplyShift acquisition January 2024 added 100,000-supplier network; deepest LCA bench; pairs supplier ESG with operational risk for high-stakes process-industry shippers.
Logistics enterprise with mature corporate-security programme tying cargo incidents to investigations
Resolver: Kroll-owned since March 2022; supply-chain investigations workflow + threat intelligence; strongest case-management for cargo-theft and shrink investigations.
Large shipper or OEM mapping multi-tier supplier risk with predictive disruption sensing
Everstream Analytics: Named Leader in the 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Supplier Risk Management Solutions for the second consecutive year; AI-driven predictive risk and event-impact forecasting.
Tier-1 OEM with sub-tier-N supplier visibility load (semiconductor, automotive, life sciences)
Resilinc: Founded 2010 by ex-Cisco supply-chain leader Bindiya Vakil; 450,000+ suppliers mapped across 200 countries; EventWatchAI multi-tier disruption monitoring.
Logistics enterprise running duty-of-care, traveler tracking, and critical-event mass notification
OnSolve / Crisis24: GardaWorld-acquired July 30 2024 and merged with Crisis24; combined platform pairs critical-event management with global SOC intelligence for traveler and cargo risk.
Tier-1 enterprise logistics with broad regulatory content (DOT, FMCSA, IMO, customs) and TPRM at scale
MetricStream: Broadest regulatory content library; modular TPRM + ERM + Compliance + Operational Risk; ServiceNow-grade scalability without the per-employee licensing trap.
Logistics buyer prioritising third-party / vendor risk depth across thousands of carriers
LogicGate Risk Cloud: Leader in the Forrester Wave Third-Party Risk Management Platforms Q1 2026; no-code workflow builder; G2 Leader 27 consecutive quarters.

Logistics risk management software is its own buyer category. A motor carrier running FMCSA CSA driver-risk scoring plus a TAPA TSR-certified yard plus a C-TPAT supply-chain-security profile plus a motor-truck-cargo insurance renewal has needs a generic GRC platform serves badly. A freight forwarder running AEO certification plus customs-broker compliance plus IMO ISPS Code for marine terminal calls plus dangerous-goods regs (49 CFR HM-181 / IATA DGR / IMDG) has different needs again. A 3PL running warehouse physical security plus shrink and cargo theft prevention plus OSHA powered-industrial-truck compliance plus contractor management has a third profile. The ten platforms in this ranking each fit at least one of those briefs; none fits all four equally well. We scored on the playbook default six-axis methodology and called out the trade-offs in each product bestFor and worstFor so a real VP Supply Chain Risk, customs manager, fleet safety director, or 3PL operations leader can find their pick in under two minutes.

We considered 23 platforms across the 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Supplier Risk Management Solutions, the Forrester Wave Third-Party Risk Management Platforms Q1 2026, the 2026 Redhand Advisors RMIS Report (which covers motor-truck-cargo and auto-liability claims platforms), Capterra Shortlist for Supply Chain Risk Management, and G2 Grid for Integrated Risk Management. We cut to ten by removing single-purpose track-and-trace platforms (project44, FourKites, Tive) that are visibility tools rather than risk platforms, removing pure carrier-rating networks (FreightSafe, RXO RoadCheck) that are scoring services rather than software platforms, removing pure dangerous-goods compliance tools (Labelmaster, Eurosafe) that are document-management rather than enterprise risk, and removing pure-EHS platforms (Sphera-EHS, Cority, VelocityEHS, Intelex, EcoOnline) whose plant-floor and chemical-management depth carries us into the manufacturing ranking instead. The result is ten platforms a real logistics buying committee would shortlist in 2026.

Cargo-theft losses surged to an estimated $725 million in 2025, a 60% increase from 2024, per the Verisk CargoNet 2025 Cargo Theft Trends release in January 2026; the average per-theft loss rose to $273,990 and 3,594 supply-chain crime events were recorded across the US and Canada. Strategic cargo theft (where organised groups impersonate carriers and use stolen identities to redirect loads) is now the dominant typology. Insurance and security spend is rising in lockstep; risk software is one of the levers logistics buyers are pulling. Pricing transparency in this segment is poor. Nine of the ten platforms here gate pricing behind a demo. We have triangulated prices for the opaque vendors from at least two independent third-party sources (SmartSuite, ITQlick, Vendr, Capterra) and dated each estimate to 2026-05-14. Mid-market logistics buyers (200-2,000 employees, 5-50 yards or terminals) typically land at $30K-$120K per year on licence plus 15-25% implementation; enterprise tier picks (Riskonnect, MetricStream, Everstream Analytics) start above $150K per year.

At-a-glance

Comparison table

The 10 platforms scored on the methodology weights at the bottom of this page. Pricing-transparency pill is the buyer-honesty signal.

RankProductBest forPricing transparencyG2Verdict
1RiskWatch
RiskWatch International
Mid-market 3PLs, freight forwarders, contract motor carriers, and large shippers (200-5,000 employees) running C-TPAT + TAPA + AEO + ISO 28000 + OSHA + PCI in one tenant who also want warehouse and terminal physical-security assessment plus customer-audit response packs.Partial4.5/5
60+ reviews
Pre-built control libraries for C-TPAT, TAPA FSR / TSR, AEO, ISO 28000 / 28001, ISO...
2Riskonnect
Riskonnect, Inc.
Large carriers, shippers, and 3PLs (5,000+ employees) running motor-truck-cargo, auto-liability, GL, and property claims at $25M+ annual reserves; Salesforce shops already paying the platform tax.Opaque4.2/5
180+ reviews
Deepest claims management module in this ranking for motor-truck-cargo,...
3Origami Risk
Origami Risk, LLC
Mid-market and large motor carriers, 3PLs, and contract logistics operators running workers comp + auto liability + cargo claims at $5M-$50M annual reserves who also want a single tenant for driver safety, DOT compliance, and EHS.Opaque4.5/5
130+ reviews
Dedicated transportation industry vertical at...
4Sphera (SupplyShift)
Sphera Solutions, Inc.
Global shippers, OEMs, and CPG / pharma / chemical manufacturers with logistics-risk briefs dominated by supplier ESG, responsible sourcing, scope-3 freight emissions, and hazmat or bulk-liquid handling regulatory content.Opaque4.0/5
110+ reviews
SupplyShift January 2024 acquisition added 100,000+ supplier engagement network across...
5Resolver
Resolver, a Kroll Business
Mid-market and large logistics operators with mature corporate-security programmes; 3PLs and shippers tying warehouse and yard incidents to supply-chain investigations and ORC case-packs for law enforcement.Opaque4.3/5
250+ reviews
Strongest investigations and case-management workflow in this ranking; cargo-theft,...
6Everstream Analytics
Everstream Analytics, Inc.
Tier-1 OEMs and global shippers (5,000+ employees) in semiconductor, automotive, life sciences, or CPG where sub-tier-N supplier visibility and predictive disruption sensing are the load-bearing requirements.Opaque4.5/5
30+ reviews
Named Leader in the 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Supplier Risk Management Solutions...
7Resilinc
Resilinc Corporation
Tier-1 OEMs in semiconductor, automotive, life sciences, aerospace, and high-tech where sub-tier-N (Tier-2, Tier-3, Tier-4) supplier-graph visibility is the load-bearing requirement.Opaque4.3/5
50+ reviews
Longest-running pure-play multi-tier supplier-risk platform in the category (founded 2010)
8OnSolve / Crisis24
Crisis24, a GardaWorld Company
International freight forwarders, ocean and air carriers, global shippers, and federal-civilian or defence-logistics primes whose load-bearing requirements are duty-of-care, traveler tracking, mass notification during critical events, and ISO 31030 traveler risk.Opaque4.4/5
220+ reviews
OnSolve + Crisis24 merger July 30 2024 pairs notification-first mass-comm with...
9MetricStream
MetricStream, Inc.
Tier-1 global shippers, OEMs, and 3PLs (10,000+ employees) running multi-regulatory programmes across DOT, FMCSA, IMO ISPS, customs (C-TPAT / AEO), ISO 28000, and sanctions where broad-content depth and analyst recognition carry the load.Opaque4.1/5
200+ reviews
Broadest regulatory content library in this ranking covering DOT, FMCSA, IMO ISPS,...
10LogicGate Risk Cloud
LogicGate, Inc.
Logistics enterprises (1,000-10,000 employees) running third-party / carrier / supplier risk programmes at thousands-of-vendor scale where no-code workflow flexibility and Forrester Wave Leader credibility carry the load.Opaque4.5/5
170+ reviews
Forrester Wave Third-Party Risk Management Platforms Q1 2026 Leader with highest...
Calculator

Estimate the licence cost

Drag the slider to your headcount. Estimates use each vendor's published or triangulated tiers. Opaque vendors show Contact sales.

500
11.3k2.5k3.8k5k
RiskWatch
Professional (≤ 1,000 employees)
$36,000/yr
Riskonnect
Enterprise entry (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
Origami Risk
Mid-market (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
Sphera (SupplyShift)
Mid-enterprise (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
Resolver
Mid-market (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
Everstream Analytics
Mid-enterprise (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
Resilinc
Mid-enterprise (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
OnSolve / Crisis24
Notification + alerts (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
MetricStream
Mid-enterprise (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
LogicGate Risk Cloud
Mid-market (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales

Estimates only. Opaque-pricing vendors do not publish list prices; bands are triangulated from public third-party sources dated 2026-05-14. Implementation services, module add-ons, and renewal escalators are extra.

Pick your own weights

Decision matrix

Default weights match the methodology at the bottom of this page. Drag the sliders to match your priorities and re-rank in real time.

20%

How quickly a non-technical control owner reaches first value

20%

Module coverage across ERM, IT, audit, TPRM, BC

20%

Price to value ratio at mid-market

15%

Quality and responsiveness of vendor support

15%

Handling 5,000+ employees, multiple entities, regions

10%

Breadth of native connectors and APIs

Weights sum: 100%
  1. 1
    RiskWatch
    Editorial rank #1
    8.64
  2. 2
    LogicGate Risk Cloud
    Editorial rank #10
    8.31
  3. 3
    Everstream Analytics
    Editorial rank #6
    8.28
  4. 4
    OnSolve / Crisis24
    Editorial rank #8
    8.28
  5. 5
    Origami Risk
    Editorial rank #3
    8.23
  6. 6
    Resilinc
    Editorial rank #7
    8.18
  7. 7
    Resolver
    Editorial rank #5
    8.18
  8. 8
    MetricStream
    Editorial rank #9
    8.13
  9. 9
    Riskonnect
    Editorial rank #2
    8.12
  10. 10
    Sphera (SupplyShift)
    Editorial rank #4
    8.07
Switching cost

Migration matrix

Read row-to-column. Row = today's platform, column = tomorrow's. Colour reflects realistic switching effort, not vendor sales pitches.

From / To
RiskWatch
Riskonnect
Origami Risk
Sphera
Resolver
Everstream Analytics
Resilinc
OnSolve / Crisis24
MetricStream
LogicGate Risk Cloud
RiskWatch.HMMMEMEME
RiskonnectH.HHHHHHHH
Origami RiskEH.MEEEEME
SpheraEHE.EEEEEE
ResolverEHEE.EEEEE
Everstream AnalyticsEHEME.EEME
ResilincEHEMEE.EME
OnSolve / Crisis24EHEMEEE.ME
MetricStreamEHEEEEEE.E
LogicGate Risk CloudEHMMMEMEM.
Easy (E)Moderate (M)Hard (H)Source: per-vendor migration field with radar-profile fallback. Treat as a directional guide, not a quote.
Methodology

How we scored and why you should trust it

The methodology is the only thing keeping this page honest. Read it carefully and apply your own weights in the decision matrix above.

RiskWatch published this ranking. RiskWatch accepts no affiliate fees, sponsorship money, or paid placements on this page. RiskWatch is also in the ranking, at #1, in the mid-market and regional logistics segment for which our platform is built. Readers should weigh that disclosure against the published evidence on this page. We scored each of the ten platforms on six axes using the playbook default weights: Ease of Use (20%), Feature Breadth (20%), Value (20%), Customer Support (15%), Scalability (15%), and Integrations (10%). Scores are 0-10 and calibrated within this logistics category (highest features 9.5, lowest 7.0). Ratings reference G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights figures pulled 2026-05-14. Pricing reflects the most-recent published or triangulated figures, also pulled 2026-05-14; where pricing is opaque we report a range based on two or more public third-party sources (SmartSuite, ITQlick, Vendr, GetApp, Capterra). We re-verify this page quarterly.

Weights used in the editorial ranking

Ease of use
20%
Feature breadth
20%
Value
20%
Customer support
15%
Scalability
15%
Integrations
10%
#1

RiskWatch

RiskWatch International · Founded 1993 · Annapolis, MD, USA

Mid-market logistics risk and compliance platform with C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, and ISO 28000 pre-mapped.

Partial pricingG2 4.5 · Capterra 4.6 · 60+ reviews

Summary

RiskWatch ships a risk and compliance assessment platform built around pre-mapped control libraries for 40+ regulatory frameworks including C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism), TAPA FSR and TSR (Transported Asset Protection Association Facility and Trucking Security Requirements), AEO (EU Authorised Economic Operator), ISO 28000 / 28001 supply-chain security, ISO 27001:2022, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, CMMC 2.0, PCI DSS, GDPR, OSHA (powered-industrial-truck + LOTO + dock safety), and Joint Commission-style audit workflows. The platform runs on a survey-based assessment engine plus an evidence vault and a cross-mapped control library, with first-party physical-security assessment for warehouses, distribution centres, marine terminals, and cross-docks. Logistics customers include 3PLs, freight forwarders, contract carriers, and large shippers. The product has been in the field since 1993, single-tenant deployment is available for customs-broker data residency, and customer-audit response packs are first-class output rather than a custom report build.

Strengths
  • Pre-built control libraries for C-TPAT, TAPA FSR / TSR, AEO, ISO 28000 / 28001, ISO 27001:2022, NIST 800-171 / CMMC 2.0 (for defence-logistics primes), PCI DSS, and OSHA (powered-industrial-truck + LOTO + dock safety) in one tenant
  • First-party physical-security assessment module (ASIS-aligned) for warehouses, distribution centres, cross-docks, marine terminals, and yard perimeters with crime-data overlay
  • Cross-mapping engine auto-detects shared controls across C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, and ISO 28000 so customs-broker, security, and operations all draw from the same evidence vault
  • 33-year operating history; customer-audit export packs are first-class output, useful when a Tier-1 retailer or DoD prime requests a TAPA or C-TPAT evidence pack
  • Vendor / supplier risk management with BAA + SOC 2 tracking for tier-1 supplier audits across a multi-3PL network
  • Single-tenant deployment with customer-owned data residency, an advantage for ITAR / EAR controlled defence logistics and EU customs-broker data-locality customers
  • Survey-based assessment engine works for non-technical control owners (warehouse managers, terminal supervisors, customs clerks) without a workflow-builder learning curve
  • Published support tier ladder, not gated demos before you see what comes with each tier
Weaknesses
  • No native motor-truck-cargo claims management at Riskonnect or Origami Risk depth; pair RiskWatch with a dedicated RMIS if MTC, auto-liability, and workers-comp claims volume is the load-bearing brief
  • No native FMCSA CSA scoring or DOT driver-qualification-file engine; fleet-safety directors should pair with Samsara, Lytx, or a DQ-file system if CSA is the dominant requirement
  • No native multi-tier supplier-mapping graph at the Everstream Analytics or Resilinc depth; manual supplier-audit workflow rather than a 450,000-supplier network
  • No native critical-event-management mass notification at the OnSolve / Crisis24 depth; pair if duty-of-care and traveler tracking are the brief
  • Public pricing is partial; we publish typical contract bands but enterprise is quote-only because deployment topology varies materially across multi-yard logistics networks
  • Brand awareness on G2 and Capterra is lower than Riskonnect, Resolver, or MetricStream for the enterprise-logistics buyer cohort; total third-party review volume sits below 100
Best for

Mid-market 3PLs, freight forwarders, contract motor carriers, and large shippers (200-5,000 employees) running C-TPAT + TAPA + AEO + ISO 28000 + OSHA + PCI in one tenant who also want warehouse and terminal physical-security assessment plus customer-audit response packs.

Worst for

Large motor carriers whose load-bearing requirement is high-volume motor-truck-cargo and auto-liability claims management at $50M+ annual reserves; Riskonnect or Origami Risk fit that brief better. Also wrong for Tier-1 OEMs whose dominant need is sub-tier-N supplier-graph visibility; Everstream Analytics or Resilinc fit that brief better.

Key features

  • Pre-built control libraries for C-TPAT, TAPA FSR / TSR, AEO, ISO 28000 / 28001, OSHA, PCI DSS, NIST 800-171, CMMC 2.0, ISO 27001:2022
  • Cross-mapping engine that auto-detects shared controls across supply-chain-security frameworks (C-TPAT / TAPA / AEO / ISO 28000)
  • Physical-security assessment module (ASIS-aligned) for warehouses, distribution centres, cross-docks, and marine terminals with crime-data overlay
  • Survey-based assessment engine for non-technical control owners (warehouse managers, terminal supervisors, customs clerks)
  • Evidence vault with versioning and customer-audit-ready export packs
  • Vendor / supplier risk management with supplier-audit and BAA tracking
  • Policy management with approval and attestation workflows for terminal and yard SOPs
  • Single-tenant deployment for ITAR / EAR and EU customs-broker data-residency requirements

Integrations

25+ native. Notable: Microsoft Entra ID (SAML SSO), Okta, Microsoft 365 / SharePoint, Slack, Jira, Salesforce, Custom REST API.

Target size

200 to 25,000 employees · US · Canada · EU · UK · AU

#2

Riskonnect

Riskonnect, Inc. · Founded 2007 · Atlanta, GA, USA

Salesforce-native integrated risk + claims platform for motor-truck-cargo, auto-liability, and TCOR programmes at scale.

Opaque pricingG2 4.2 · Capterra 4.4 · 180+ reviews

Summary

Riskonnect runs on Salesforce and is built around an integrated-risk data model that covers ten GRC disciplines from one tenant. The company serves 2,700+ enterprise customers including transportation and logistics firms across motor-carrier, ocean-carrier, freight-forwarder, and 3PL sectors. The platform's logistics strengths are in claims management (motor-truck-cargo, auto-liability, general liability, workers comp, property) and total-cost-of-risk (TCOR) reporting, plus the Ventiv-acquisition-derived insurance content for cargo and marine policies. The 2026 Redhand Advisors RMIS Report listed Riskonnect among the highest-rated RMIS platforms in the market. Pricing is opaque; SmartSuite triangulates enterprise entry at $283,000 annually.

Strengths
  • Deepest claims management module in this ranking for motor-truck-cargo, auto-liability, GL, workers comp, and property
  • Total cost of risk (TCOR) reporting purpose-built for insurance-led carrier and shipper programmes
  • Salesforce-native architecture inherits Salesforce SSO, mobile, and reporting; useful for shops already on Salesforce Service Cloud for customer-service
  • 2,700+ enterprise customers with reference accounts across transportation, logistics, and 3PL
  • 2026 Redhand Advisors RMIS Report listed Riskonnect among the highest-rated RMIS solutions for motor-truck-cargo and auto-liability claims
  • Connected risk model unifies ERM, claims, business continuity, and third-party risk in one data layer
Weaknesses
  • Highest entry price in this ranking; SmartSuite reports enterprise entry at $283,000 annually before negotiation
  • G2 reviewers consistently flag initial complexity and overwhelming UI before familiarity sets in
  • Salesforce platform-tax: non-Salesforce logistics shops absorb a platform fee they did not budget for
  • Triple-PE ownership (TA Associates, Thoma Bravo, Arrowroot Capital) historically elevates renewal-pricing pressure at year 2 and year 3 with 8-15% typical uplift
  • Not a native supply-chain-security platform; C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, and ISO 28000 frameworks are configurable rather than pre-built, which adds consulting hours at deployment
  • Implementation typically 25-40% of first-year licence; consulting-heavy deployment
Best for

Large carriers, shippers, and 3PLs (5,000+ employees) running motor-truck-cargo, auto-liability, GL, and property claims at $25M+ annual reserves; Salesforce shops already paying the platform tax.

Worst for

Sub-500-employee single-yard logistics operators chasing C-TPAT or TAPA certification on a $50K budget; cost-prohibitive and over-built for that scale.

Key features

  • Salesforce-native data model
  • Claims management for motor-truck-cargo, auto-liability, GL, workers comp, property
  • Total cost of risk (TCOR) analytics
  • Enterprise risk management (ERM) with KRIs
  • Business continuity + operational resilience
  • Third-party / vendor risk management for carrier and supplier audits
  • Connected risk dashboards
  • Carrier-data integration for claims feeds

Integrations

200+ native. Notable: Salesforce AppExchange ecosystem, Microsoft Entra ID, ServiceNow, SAP, Workday, Tableau.

Target size

2,000 to 1,00,000 employees · US · Canada · UK · EU · AU · APAC · LATAM

#3

Origami Risk

Origami Risk, LLC · Founded 2009 · Chicago, IL, USA

Founder-led RMIS with a dedicated transportation industry vertical for driver safety, claims, and DOT compliance.

Opaque pricingG2 4.5 · Capterra 4.6 · 130+ reviews

Summary

Origami Risk was founded in 2009 in Chicago by Bob Petrie and Earne Bentley, both Marsh ClearSight veterans, and remains independent and founder-led. Spectrum Equity made a growth investment in 2018 without taking control. The platform ships a configurable Risk Management Information System (RMIS) covering claims, risk register, EHS-adjacent safety, and analytics, with a dedicated transportation industry vertical that pairs RMIS with EHS and GRC modules to improve driver safety, ensure DOT and FMCSA compliance, and reduce loss costs. Origami is recognised in the 2026 Redhand Advisors RMIS Report. User satisfaction sits at 91% across recognised review sites.

Strengths
  • Dedicated transportation industry vertical at origamirisk.com/industries/transportation/ with driver safety, claims, EHS, and DOT compliance in one tenant
  • Independent founder-led ownership; no PE-renewal-pressure dynamic and no rebrand churn
  • 91% user satisfaction across recognised review sites; high configurability for region- and fleet-specific workflows
  • 2026 Redhand Advisors RMIS Report featured product; deep claims module with photo attachment, EDI feeds, and police-report categorisation
  • Strong analytics and dashboards praised by claims-team reviewers; intuitive claims-dashboard for intake-to-resolution tracking
  • Lower entry price than Riskonnect; SelectHub lists possible starting range $500-$1,000 per month for the smallest configurations
Weaknesses
  • Pricing is opaque; vendor declines to publish list price and routes all inquiries through demo
  • Some users report the price tag is steep for smaller logistics buyers once full-suite (claims + EHS + GRC + driver risk) is deployed
  • Smaller customer base than Riskonnect for enterprise reference calls on the largest carrier and shipper deployments
  • Not a native supply-chain-security platform; C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, and ISO 28000 frameworks are configurable rather than pre-built
  • Configurability is a moat but also a tax; non-technical admins find the initial setup steep without consulting hours
  • Brand awareness on G2 is lower than Riskonnect or Resolver despite the higher user-satisfaction score
Best for

Mid-market and large motor carriers, 3PLs, and contract logistics operators running workers comp + auto liability + cargo claims at $5M-$50M annual reserves who also want a single tenant for driver safety, DOT compliance, and EHS.

Worst for

Buyers who need C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, or ISO 28000 pre-mapped libraries at the RiskWatch level; Origami covers those via configurable forms rather than turnkey libraries.

Key features

  • Risk register + assessment engine
  • Claims management for motor-truck-cargo, auto, workers comp, GL, property
  • Driver safety and CSA compliance workflow
  • DOT and FMCSA compliance documentation
  • Configurable forms + workflows
  • Analytics + dashboards + reports for fleet-level rollup
  • Policy management
  • Carrier-data integration for claims and EDI feeds

Integrations

40+ native. Notable: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, Salesforce, Power BI, Tableau, SAP.

Target size

500 to 50,000 employees · US · Canada · UK · EU · AU

#4

Sphera (SupplyShift)

Sphera Solutions, Inc. · Founded 2016 · Chicago, IL, USA

Supplier risk + ESG + LCA platform for global shippers and OEMs with scope-3 emissions load.

Opaque pricingG2 4.0 · Capterra 4.2 · 110+ reviews

Summary

Sphera acquired SupplyShift in January 2024, adding a 100,000-supplier engagement network to its existing operational-risk and ESG portfolio. The combined platform pairs supplier-engagement assessments with supplier risk monitoring, LCA, and Scope 1-3 ESG reporting, making it the natural pick for global shippers and OEMs whose logistics-risk brief is dominated by supplier sustainability, scope-3 emissions across freight, and responsible-sourcing audits. Verdantix Green Quadrant 2025 rated Sphera a Leader. Sphera-wide review volume sits above 100 across product lines; SpheraCloud carries an average G2 score of about 4.0/5.

Strengths
  • SupplyShift January 2024 acquisition added 100,000+ supplier engagement network across pharma, food and beverage, industrial, and CPG verticals
  • Deepest Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) bench in the category for Scope 1-3 ESG reporting including scope-3 freight emissions for logistics
  • Wholesale chemical and substance compliance content library (GHS, REACH, TSCA, CSCL, JCSS) for cross-border logistics of regulated goods
  • Verdantix Green Quadrant Leader 2025; recognised by sustainability analysts as a top-tier platform
  • Blackstone ownership since 2021 has stabilised roadmap and product investment after the Genstar-era acquisition spree
  • Operational Risk Management module covers PHA, HAZOP, LOPA, and MOC for hazmat-handling terminals and bulk-liquid logistics
Weaknesses
  • SpheraCloud G2 reviewers (May 2026) note dashboard lag and server-side performance complaints
  • User interface is not intuitive out of the box; learning curve is steep and training is heavy
  • Genstar-era acquisition heritage means the product is a portfolio of modules rather than a single unified platform; data-model coherence varies module by module post-SupplyShift integration
  • Not a fast-deployment product; expect 9-18 month implementation for full-suite deployment at a multi-region shipper
  • Enterprise pricing typically lands above $100K per year; not the right pick for sub-500-employee logistics operators
  • Not a native motor-truck-cargo or auto-liability claims platform; pair with Riskonnect or Origami Risk for the claims brief
Best for

Global shippers, OEMs, and CPG / pharma / chemical manufacturers with logistics-risk briefs dominated by supplier ESG, responsible sourcing, scope-3 freight emissions, and hazmat or bulk-liquid handling regulatory content.

Worst for

Sub-500-employee 3PLs or motor carriers chasing C-TPAT or TAPA certification; cost-prohibitive and architected for sustainability and process-industry depth this buyer does not need.

Key features

  • Supplier engagement network (100,000+ suppliers post-SupplyShift)
  • Supplier risk monitoring and ESG assessment
  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for product carbon footprint
  • Scope 1-3 ESG reporting + CSRD + scope-3 freight emissions
  • Substance compliance content (GHS, REACH, TSCA, CSCL, JCSS)
  • Process hazard analysis (PHA), HAZOP, LOPA workflow
  • Management of change (MOC) for hazmat-handling sites
  • Audit management for ISO 14001 and supplier audits

Integrations

40+ native. Notable: SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Entra ID, Workday, Tableau, OSIsoft PI, AVEVA.

Target size

1,000 to 1,00,000 employees · US · Canada · UK · EU · AU · APAC · LATAM

#5

Resolver

Resolver, a Kroll Business · Founded 2000 · Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Kroll-owned operational-risk + investigations platform for cargo-theft, shrink, and supply-chain investigations.

Opaque pricingG2 4.3 · Capterra 4.3 · 250+ reviews

Summary

Resolver was founded in 2000 in Toronto and was acquired by Kroll in March 2022. The platform sits at the intersection of operational risk, physical security, incident management, and investigations, which makes it the natural pick when a logistics operator's risk programme is owned by corporate security and connects warehouse and yard incidents to supply-chain investigations and cargo-theft case management. Resolver was a 2025 G2 Best Software Awards honoree in the GRC category and carries about 87% user satisfaction across 246+ third-party reviews. Kroll's supply-chain investigations practice unlocks intelligence-led risk feeds that standalone software vendors cannot match.

Strengths
  • Strongest investigations and case-management workflow in this ranking; cargo-theft, shrink, and supply-chain fraud cases are first-class workflow not afterthoughts
  • Kroll ownership unlocks intelligence-led risk feeds and global investigations support that standalone vendors cannot match (Kroll Supply Chain Risk Review, Software Supply Chain Security)
  • G2 Leader 2025; 87% user satisfaction across 246+ third-party reviews
  • Mature operational-risk and compliance modules that map well to ISO 31000 and COSO ERM for board reporting
  • Configurable risk register with KRI tracking; useful for the carrier-level shrink and loss rollup
  • Strong brand-protection and threat-assessment for shippers whose load profile draws ORC attention
Weaknesses
  • Pricing is opaque; no public mid-market entry tier
  • Setup and configuration is heavy; G2 reviews flag implementation effort as the most-cited downside
  • UX has not had a generational rewrite; competitors with newer interfaces feel more modern on first run
  • Pulled toward security-operations and investigations use cases; less natural fit for the EHS-led or claims-led logistics buyer
  • Module-by-module pricing (ERM, Incident, Investigations, Audit, Compliance, TPRM separate SKUs) means TCO grows quickly
  • Not a native supplier-graph or multi-tier mapping platform at Everstream or Resilinc depth
Best for

Mid-market and large logistics operators with mature corporate-security programmes; 3PLs and shippers tying warehouse and yard incidents to supply-chain investigations and ORC case-packs for law enforcement.

Worst for

Single-warehouse small operators chasing C-TPAT or TAPA on a tight budget; over-built and over-priced for that scale.

Key features

  • Incident reporting + case management for cargo-theft, shrink, and yard incidents
  • Investigations workflow with chain-of-custody
  • Operational risk register + KRIs
  • Internal audit planning + fieldwork
  • Compliance management aligned to ISO 31000 + COSO ERM
  • Third-party / vendor risk module
  • Brand-protection + threat-assessment (Kroll-powered)
  • Configurable dashboards + reporting

Integrations

40+ native. Notable: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, ServiceNow, Splunk, Jira, Salesforce, Kroll intelligence feeds.

Target size

1,000 to 1,00,000 employees · US · Canada · UK · EU · AU

#6

Everstream Analytics

Everstream Analytics, Inc. · Founded 2021 · San Marcos, CA, USA

AI-driven supplier risk and multi-tier disruption sensing for global shippers and OEMs.

Opaque pricingG2 4.5 · Capterra 4.4 · 30+ reviews

Summary

Everstream Analytics was named a Leader in the 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Supplier Risk Management Solutions for the second consecutive year. The platform transforms supplier-risk intelligence with AI-driven predictive analytics that identify supplier-failure and freight-disruption events before they escalate, drawing on real-time data from global events, ocean and air logistics, weather, geopolitics, and financial signals. The company is headquartered in San Marcos, California, has raised $74M in total funding across three rounds from Morgan Stanley, StepStone Group, and Greenspring Associates, and is led by CEO Corey Rhodes. Gartner Peer Insights rates Everstream 4.6/5 across 8 reviews.

Strengths
  • Named Leader in the 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Supplier Risk Management Solutions for the second consecutive year
  • AI-driven predictive analytics for supply-chain disruption sensing; event-impact forecasting at the SKU and lane level rather than at the supplier level only
  • Multi-modal data fusion (weather, geopolitics, ocean and air logistics, sanctions, financial distress signals) into a single risk feed
  • Gartner Peer Insights 4.6/5 across 8 reviews (small but consistent positive bench)
  • $74M total funding from blue-chip investors (Morgan Stanley, StepStone, Greenspring) reduces vendor-viability risk for a 5-year commitment
  • Strong reference accounts in semiconductor, automotive, and life-sciences OEMs where sub-tier supplier visibility carries the load
Weaknesses
  • Pricing is opaque; G2 lists no pricing and recommends contacting the vendor; SmartSuite and Vendr triangulate enterprise entry at $100K-$250K per year before negotiation
  • Not a native motor-truck-cargo or auto-liability claims platform; pair with Riskonnect or Origami Risk for the claims brief
  • Not a native C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, or ISO 28000 framework-library platform; the platform is a risk-sensing tool not a compliance-audit tool
  • Series B private (founded 2021) is younger than the 20-30-year incumbents; long-horizon roadmap stability carries Series-B-stage risk
  • Review volume is small (8 on Gartner Peer Insights; G2 pricing page is bare); independent reference-call coverage is thinner than for Riskonnect or Resolver
  • Buyers should validate that the supplier-graph covers their specific industry's sub-tier-N supply base before committing
Best for

Tier-1 OEMs and global shippers (5,000+ employees) in semiconductor, automotive, life sciences, or CPG where sub-tier-N supplier visibility and predictive disruption sensing are the load-bearing requirements.

Worst for

3PLs and motor carriers whose dominant requirement is C-TPAT or TAPA certification or motor-truck-cargo claims; Everstream is a supplier-side platform not a carrier-side platform.

Key features

  • AI-driven predictive supply-chain risk analytics
  • Multi-tier supplier mapping
  • Event-impact forecasting at the SKU and lane level
  • Multi-modal data fusion (weather, geopolitics, ocean and air, sanctions, financial)
  • Supplier financial-distress signals
  • Sanctions and trade-compliance screening
  • Logistics-disruption alerting (ocean, air, road)
  • Risk dashboards for procurement and supply-chain teams

Integrations

30+ native. Notable: SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Entra ID, Coupa, Ariba, Tableau, Power BI.

Target size

1,000 to 1,00,000 employees · US · Canada · UK · EU · AU · APAC

#7

Resilinc

Resilinc Corporation · Founded 2010 · Milpitas, CA, USA

Multi-tier supplier-graph and EventWatchAI disruption sensing for high-tech and life-sciences OEMs.

Opaque pricingG2 4.3 · Capterra 4.2 · 50+ reviews

Summary

Resilinc was founded in 2010 by Bindiya Vakil (ex-Cisco, ex-Flextronics, ex-Broadcom; MIT supply-chain master, Finance MBA) and Sumit Vakil. The company is based in Milpitas, California, and is the longest-running pure-play multi-tier supplier-risk platform in the category. Resilinc maps 450,000+ suppliers across 200 countries and ships EventWatchAI, an artificial-intelligence-powered monitoring system that identifies impending disruptions for the OEM's specific supply base. The platform is the natural pick for Tier-1 semiconductor, automotive, and life-sciences OEMs whose sub-tier-N supply-base visibility is the load-bearing requirement. Gartner Peer Insights rates Resilinc 4.3/5 across 16 reviews.

Strengths
  • Longest-running pure-play multi-tier supplier-risk platform in the category (founded 2010)
  • 450,000+ suppliers mapped across 200 countries; the deepest supplier-graph in this ranking
  • EventWatchAI multi-tier disruption monitoring; the platform anticipated COVID-era and 2021 semiconductor disruptions for several Tier-1 OEMs
  • Founder-led independence; CEO Bindiya Vakil has been Supply & Demand Chain Executive Woman of the Year and brings 20+ years of ex-Cisco / Flextronics / Broadcom domain depth
  • Strong reference accounts in semiconductor, life-sciences, automotive, and high-tech OEMs
  • Real-time mapping and disruption-mitigation positioning is the differentiator versus Everstream's predictive positioning
Weaknesses
  • Pricing is opaque; no public list price; SmartSuite and ITQlick triangulate enterprise entry at $75K-$200K per year
  • Smaller mindshare than Everstream Analytics post-2026 Gartner MQ Leader recognition
  • Not a native motor-truck-cargo or auto-liability claims platform
  • Not a native C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, or ISO 28000 framework-library platform; the platform is a supplier-graph not a compliance-audit tool
  • Independent founder-led private status limits independent financial disclosure; buyers should request audited financials before a 5-year commitment
  • Implementation services run 15-25% of first-year licence; multi-tier mapping requires customer time-investment to seed supplier data
Best for

Tier-1 OEMs in semiconductor, automotive, life sciences, aerospace, and high-tech where sub-tier-N (Tier-2, Tier-3, Tier-4) supplier-graph visibility is the load-bearing requirement.

Worst for

3PLs, motor carriers, and freight forwarders whose dominant requirement is C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO certification or motor-truck-cargo claims; Resilinc is a supplier-side platform not a carrier-side platform.

Key features

  • Multi-tier supplier mapping (Tier-2, Tier-3, Tier-4)
  • EventWatchAI disruption monitoring
  • Supplier risk scoring and dashboards
  • Sub-tier dependency analysis for SKU and BOM
  • Business continuity planning workflow
  • Supplier ESG and human-rights tier add-ons
  • Sanctions and trade screening
  • Real-time disruption alerting

Integrations

25+ native. Notable: SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Entra ID, Coupa, Ariba, Tableau, Power BI.

Target size

1,000 to 1,00,000 employees · US · Canada · UK · EU · AU · APAC · LATAM

#8

OnSolve / Crisis24

Crisis24, a GardaWorld Company · Founded 1998 · Boca Raton, FL, USA (OnSolve) / Montreal, QC, Canada (GardaWorld)

Critical event management + global SOC intelligence for traveler, driver, and cargo duty-of-care.

Opaque pricingG2 4.4 · Capterra 4.5 · 220+ reviews

Summary

OnSolve was acquired by GardaWorld and merged with Crisis24 on July 30 2024, creating a global AI-enhanced integrated risk management platform that pairs OnSolve's mass-notification and critical-event-management depth with Crisis24's global Security Operations Centre and intelligence-led risk feeds. The combined platform is the natural pick for logistics operators whose load-bearing requirements are duty-of-care for drivers and travelers, mass-notification across the carrier or shipper workforce during severe weather or geopolitical events, and ISO 31030 traveler risk for international freight forwarders and global shippers. The platform supports real-time geopolitical alerts, weather data, transportation and route disruption feeds, cyber threat intelligence, and sanctions and regulatory monitoring.

Strengths
  • OnSolve + Crisis24 merger July 30 2024 pairs notification-first mass-comm with intelligence-first global SOC; the combined platform covers both the alert and the analysis
  • Crisis24 global SOC intelligence is built for traveler, asset, and brand duty-of-care; relevant for international freight forwarders, ocean and air carriers, and global shippers
  • Real-time multi-source intelligence (geopolitics + weather + transportation + cyber + sanctions) at a single console
  • GardaWorld parent provides on-the-ground security response and crisis management when an event escalates from alert to action
  • ISO 31030 traveler-risk-management fit for international logistics buyers with mobile workforces
  • FedRAMP authorisation for the OnSolve mass-notification component supports federal-civilian and defence-logistics buyers
Weaknesses
  • Pricing is opaque; published market commentary cites ranges from $10,000/year (notification only) to $500,000/year (consultancy and SOC retainer); price-discovery is consultative not transparent
  • Not a native risk-register or claims platform; pair with Riskonnect or Origami Risk for the claims and TCOR brief
  • Not a native C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, or ISO 28000 framework-library platform; this is a CEM and intelligence tool not a compliance-audit tool
  • Post-merger product integration is still in flight (July 2024 close); buyers should validate which features are fully unified versus still on separate code-bases
  • Heavy services component (SOC retainer, consulting) raises TCO above the licence quote; ask for the all-in 3-year cost in writing
  • Strongest fit is the duty-of-care and CEM use case; less natural fit if the dominant requirement is supplier-graph mapping or carrier-side compliance
Best for

International freight forwarders, ocean and air carriers, global shippers, and federal-civilian or defence-logistics primes whose load-bearing requirements are duty-of-care, traveler tracking, mass notification during critical events, and ISO 31030 traveler risk.

Worst for

Single-yard 3PLs or motor carriers chasing C-TPAT or TAPA certification; OnSolve / Crisis24 is over-built for that brief and priced above the typical mid-market budget.

Key features

  • Mass notification across multiple channels (SMS, voice, email, app)
  • Critical event management with workflow and escalation
  • Global SOC intelligence (Crisis24)
  • Real-time geopolitical, weather, transportation, cyber, sanctions feeds
  • ISO 31030 traveler risk management
  • Duty-of-care workflow for travelers and drivers
  • GardaWorld on-the-ground security response integration
  • FedRAMP-authorised mass-notification component

Integrations

100+ native. Notable: Microsoft Entra ID, ServiceNow, Workday, Concur, Salesforce, Splunk.

Target size

1,000 to 2,50,000 employees · Global

#9

MetricStream

MetricStream, Inc. · Founded 1999 · San Jose, CA, USA

Broad-content integrated risk and TPRM platform for Tier-1 enterprise logistics buyers.

Opaque pricingG2 4.1 · Capterra 4.3 · 200+ reviews

Summary

MetricStream is the broad-content integrated risk management platform that ships pre-built libraries for the regulatory content a Tier-1 enterprise logistics buyer needs to manage at scale: ISO 31000 + ISO 28000 + COSO ERM + FFIEC IT examination + DOT + FMCSA + IMO ISPS + customs (C-TPAT / AEO) + sanctions screening + GDPR + SOC 2 + HIPAA where the logistics buyer touches healthcare freight. The platform is a modular suite (ERM + TPRM + Compliance + Operational Risk + IT Risk + Audit + Business Continuity) and is the natural pick for Tier-1 global shippers, OEMs, and 3PLs whose buying committee scores feature coverage and analyst recognition. Pricing is opaque and ranges from $100K to $1M+ per year per published third-party triangulations.

Strengths
  • Broadest regulatory content library in this ranking covering DOT, FMCSA, IMO ISPS, C-TPAT, AEO, ISO 28000, ISO 31000, COSO ERM, sanctions, and customs
  • Modular suite (ERM + TPRM + Compliance + Operational Risk + IT Risk + Audit + Business Continuity) scales from a single deployment to a global enterprise
  • TPRM module covers vendor and carrier audits at multi-thousand-supplier scale
  • Deep analyst recognition (Gartner Magic Quadrant, Forrester Wave) for IRM and TPRM categories
  • 26-year operating history (founded 1999); long roadmap-stability horizon
  • Strong analytics and dashboards for board-level TCOR and risk-posture reporting
Weaknesses
  • Highest TCO in this ranking after Riskonnect; enterprise full-suite deployments run $250K-$1M+ per year
  • G2 and Gartner Peer Insights reviewers consistently flag complex implementation and consultant-heavy deployment (typical 9-18 months)
  • UI shows operational heritage; newer entrants feel more modern on first run for non-technical operations users
  • Module-by-module licensing; full-suite cost grows quickly as the buyer adds TPRM + Compliance + Audit + BCM
  • Not a native motor-truck-cargo or auto-liability claims platform; pair with Riskonnect or Origami Risk for the claims brief
  • Pricing transparency is opaque; published third-party triangulations span a wide $100K-$1M+ range which is hard to plan against without a quote
Best for

Tier-1 global shippers, OEMs, and 3PLs (10,000+ employees) running multi-regulatory programmes across DOT, FMCSA, IMO ISPS, customs (C-TPAT / AEO), ISO 28000, and sanctions where broad-content depth and analyst recognition carry the load.

Worst for

Mid-market 3PLs, freight forwarders, or single-mode carriers under 1,000 employees; over-built, over-priced, and longer to deploy than the brief warrants.

Key features

  • Enterprise risk management (ERM) with KRI tracking
  • Third-party / vendor / carrier risk management
  • Compliance management with broad regulatory content (DOT, FMCSA, IMO ISPS, customs)
  • Operational risk management
  • IT and cyber risk management
  • Internal audit management
  • Business continuity and operational resilience
  • Analytics and dashboards for board reporting

Integrations

150+ native. Notable: SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Entra ID, ServiceNow, Workday, Tableau, Salesforce.

Target size

2,000 to 2,50,000 employees · Global

#10

LogicGate Risk Cloud

LogicGate, Inc. · Founded 2015 · Chicago, IL, USA

No-code workflow-builder GRC platform with Forrester-Leader TPRM for carrier and supplier portfolios.

Opaque pricingG2 4.5 · Capterra 4.4 · 170+ reviews

Summary

LogicGate Risk Cloud was named a Leader in the Forrester Wave Third-Party Risk Management Platforms Q1 2026, earning the highest possible scores across 11 criteria including Innovation, AI Governance, and Usability. The platform is a no-code workflow builder for GRC, with first-class TPRM, ERM, IT risk, and internal-audit applications. LogicGate has been recognised as a G2 Leader for 27 consecutive quarters. For logistics buyers, the platform is the natural pick when the dominant requirement is third-party / carrier / supplier risk management at thousands-of-vendor scale, with configurable workflow that a non-technical compliance or supply-chain team can build without engineering.

Strengths
  • Forrester Wave Third-Party Risk Management Platforms Q1 2026 Leader with highest possible scores across 11 criteria
  • G2 Leader for 27 consecutive quarters; consistent positive review pattern from non-technical admins
  • No-code workflow builder is the moat; supply-chain or compliance teams can build configurable assessment workflows without engineering
  • Strong TPRM module for carrier and supplier portfolios at thousands-of-vendor scale
  • ERM, IT Risk, Internal Audit, and Compliance applications in one tenant; the buyer is not stuck buying separate modules from separate vendors
  • PSG Equity backing provides growth capital without the renewal-pricing pressure of triple-PE peers
Weaknesses
  • Pricing is opaque; Vendr and SmartSuite triangulate enterprise entry at $30K-$120K per year with full-suite deployments at $150K-$300K
  • G2 reviewers flag thin AI adoption; Spark AI is described as in its infancy versus newer Drata, Optro / AuditBoard, and Vanta competitors
  • Manual evidence-collection effort is higher than for specific compliance-automation competitors (Drata, Vanta) that ship deeper API-based evidence pulls
  • Not a native motor-truck-cargo or auto-liability claims platform; pair with Riskonnect or Origami Risk for the claims brief
  • Not a native C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, or ISO 28000 framework-library platform; covered via configurable workflow rather than turnkey libraries
  • Brand awareness in pure logistics segments (motor-carrier, ocean-carrier, 3PL) is lower than Riskonnect or Resolver
Best for

Logistics enterprises (1,000-10,000 employees) running third-party / carrier / supplier risk programmes at thousands-of-vendor scale where no-code workflow flexibility and Forrester Wave Leader credibility carry the load.

Worst for

Single-yard small operators chasing C-TPAT or TAPA on a tight budget; over-built and the configurable-workflow approach requires admin time that small operators do not have.

Key features

  • No-code workflow builder for GRC
  • Third-party / vendor / carrier risk management
  • Enterprise risk management (ERM) with KRI dashboards
  • IT and cyber risk management
  • Internal audit management
  • Policy and compliance management
  • Spark AI for narratives and risk-event summaries
  • Configurable assessments + evidence collection

Integrations

60+ native. Notable: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, ServiceNow, Jira, Slack, Salesforce, Tableau.

Target size

500 to 50,000 employees · US · Canada · UK · EU · AU

Step by step

Buying guide

Walk these steps in order. The shortlist falls out of step 1, the negotiation moves come together in step 6, and step 8 closes the deal.

  1. 1

    Name the load-bearing logistics requirement in one sentence

    Before you shortlist, write down the one requirement you absolutely must solve. Examples: pass a C-TPAT validation and a TAPA TSR-certification on the same evidence vault by Q4; cut motor-truck-cargo claims frequency by 20% via driver-risk scoring and post-loss investigation; map sub-tier-2 and sub-tier-3 suppliers across a 5,000-supplier base ahead of an EU CSRD scope-3 disclosure; replace an aging Riskonnect renewal whose escalator is now 12%; build a duty-of-care programme for international drivers and travelers. The shortlist falls out of the one-sentence answer.

  2. 2

    Sort by carrier-side compliance vs supplier-side vs RMIS-claims vs CEM

    Four platforms here are carrier-side compliance and GRC (RiskWatch, Resolver, MetricStream, LogicGate). Two are RMIS-claims and operational (Riskonnect, Origami Risk). Three are supplier-side risk (Everstream Analytics, Resilinc, Sphera / SupplyShift). One is critical-event-management and intelligence (OnSolve / Crisis24). A pure C-TPAT / TAPA / AEO compliance brief lands in carrier-side GRC. A pure claims-and-TCOR brief lands in RMIS-claims. A pure supplier-graph brief lands in supplier-side. A pure duty-of-care or mass-notification brief lands in CEM.

  3. 3

    Match the shortlist to fleet size, yard count, and budget

    Single-yard small operator under 200 employees with a $30K budget rules out everything except RiskWatch Standard and LogicGate mid-market for a single application. 5-50 yards or terminals with 200-2,000 employees and a $50K-$120K budget filters in RiskWatch Professional, Origami Risk mid-market, Resolver mid-market, and LogicGate mid-market. 50+ yards or terminals with 5,000+ employees and a $250K+ budget filters back in Riskonnect enterprise, MetricStream enterprise full-suite, Everstream enterprise, Resilinc enterprise, OnSolve / Crisis24 with SOC retainer, and Sphera enterprise.

  4. 4

    Pull the G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights patterns from the last 12 months by role

    For each shortlisted vendor, read 20+ G2 and Capterra reviews from the last 12 months, segmented by role. Common patterns in this category: 'deep feature set with a steep learning curve' (Riskonnect, MetricStream, Sphera); 'great configurability but consultant-heavy deployment' (Origami Risk, LogicGate, Resolver); 'AI-driven predictive feed is strong but reference base is smaller than incumbent' (Everstream, Resilinc); 'merger integration still in flight' (OnSolve / Crisis24 post-July 2024 GardaWorld close); 'partial pricing with multi-tier-3 calibre framework libraries' (RiskWatch).

  5. 5

    Ask each vendor for the renewal-escalator cap in writing

    Renewal-pricing pressure is the silent budget killer in this category. Riskonnect carries triple-PE ownership (TA Associates + Thoma Bravo + Arrowroot). Sphera is Blackstone-owned. MetricStream is Clearlake / Goldman-owned. LogicGate is PSG Equity-backed. OnSolve / Crisis24 is GardaWorld-owned. Resolver is Kroll-owned. Six of the ten vendors here are PE-owned or PE-backed with typical 8-15% annual uplift pressure at year 2 and year 3. Ask for the renewal-escalator cap in the master subscription agreement and walk if the vendor refuses.

  6. 6

    Insist on a 30-day working pilot using real shipment and claim data

    Demos are choreographed. Working pilots are not. Ask each finalist for a 30-day pilot with your real data: one C-TPAT or TAPA evidence pack, one motor-truck-cargo claim, one supplier-audit workflow, one warehouse or terminal physical-security assessment, one customer-audit response. The platform that handles your data without three weeks of professional services is the one that will scale across the carrier network or yard network post-deal. Pay close attention to offline mobile experience for yard workers, drivers, and warehouse staff because connectivity is uneven across yards, terminals, and last-mile routes.

  7. 7

    Pressure-test the data residency, ITAR or EAR posture, and exit clause

    Your shipment and supplier data is sensitive. Defence-logistics primes running ITAR or EAR controlled data must confirm US-only data residency in writing. EU customs-broker buyers must confirm EU residency under GDPR. Ask each vendor: where does my data live, who can access it, what is the ITAR or EAR posture, and what happens to it if I leave? RiskWatch supports single-tenant deployment with customer-owned data residency. Most vendors are multi-tenant; that is fine if the SOC 2 and ITAR or EAR attestation hold up. Get the exit clause in writing: data export format, retention period after termination, and price.

  8. 8

    Run the decision matrix on this page with your own weights

    The default methodology weights on this page (20% Ease, 20% Features, 20% Value, 15% Support, 15% Scalability, 10% Integrations) reflect a generic mid-market logistics buyer. Your weights may differ. A VP Supply Chain Risk weights features higher because the buying committee scores feature coverage and broad regulatory content. A CFO weights value higher because TCOR matters. A customs / trade compliance manager weights ease-of-use higher because non-technical broker staff must adopt the platform. Use the decision-matrix slider on this page to re-rank with your weights before you book the demos.

Frequently asked

Buyer questions, answered

The eight questions our pre-sales team hears the most often when buyers compare this category.

What is the difference between supply-chain risk software and logistics risk management software?
Supply-chain risk software (Everstream Analytics, Resilinc, Sphera SupplyShift) is built around supplier-side risk: mapping multi-tier suppliers, monitoring supplier financial distress, predicting disruption events at the SKU and lane level. Logistics risk management software is the broader category that also covers carrier-side compliance (C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, ISO 28000), motor-truck-cargo and auto-liability claims, FMCSA CSA driver risk, and warehouse and terminal physical security. Three platforms in this ranking are pure supplier-side (Everstream, Resilinc, Sphera SupplyShift). Three are carrier-side claims and operational (Riskonnect, Origami Risk, OnSolve / Crisis24). Four are full-stack GRC with logistics modules (RiskWatch, Resolver, MetricStream, LogicGate).
Which platforms cover C-TPAT and TAPA certification readiness out of the box?
RiskWatch ships pre-mapped C-TPAT and TAPA FSR and TSR control libraries with cross-mapping to AEO and ISO 28000 for shippers that hold multiple certifications. MetricStream covers C-TPAT and TAPA via its broad regulatory content library but configuration is consultant-heavy. Resolver supports C-TPAT and TAPA via configurable compliance workflow. Riskonnect, Origami Risk, LogicGate, Everstream, Resilinc, Sphera, and OnSolve / Crisis24 cover supply-chain-security frameworks via configurable workflow rather than turnkey libraries; expect 30-60 days of configuration consulting to bring those vendors to parity with RiskWatch on the C-TPAT and TAPA brief.
How much should a mid-market 3PL or motor carrier budget for risk management software in 2026?
Mid-market 3PLs and motor carriers (200-2,000 employees, 5-50 yards or terminals) typically budget $30K-$120K per year on licence plus 15-25% one-time implementation for a single-platform deployment. For the carrier-side picks expect $30K-$55K licence + $5K-$15K implementation (RiskWatch Professional, Origami Risk mid-market, LogicGate mid-market). For the supplier-side picks expect $75K-$150K licence + $15K-$40K implementation (Everstream, Resilinc, Sphera mid-enterprise). Enterprise tier picks (Riskonnect, MetricStream, OnSolve / Crisis24 with SOC retainer) start above $150K per year and routinely run $250K-$500K at full-suite scale. Always model 3-year TCO and ask for the renewal-escalator cap in writing.
How material is the 2025 cargo-theft surge to the buying decision?
Per Verisk CargoNet's 2025 Cargo Theft Trends release in January 2026, estimated losses surged to $725 million in 2025, a 60% increase from 2024, with the average per-theft loss rising to $273,990 across 3,594 supply-chain crime events in the US and Canada. Strategic cargo theft (organised groups impersonating carriers, using stolen identities to redirect loads) is now the dominant typology, replacing straight hijacking. The implication for buyers is that motor-truck-cargo claims volume and average-loss-per-claim are both rising fast, which puts upward pressure on the RMIS and claims-management brief (Riskonnect, Origami Risk) and the investigations brief (Resolver, OnSolve / Crisis24). Carrier-side compliance (C-TPAT, TAPA) is also rising in board priority because Tier-1 retailers and DoD primes increasingly require it from their carriers.
Which platforms handle FMCSA CSA driver risk and DOT compliance?
Origami Risk ships the deepest first-party DOT and FMCSA CSA driver-risk workflow of the platforms in this ranking via its dedicated transportation industry vertical at origamirisk.com/industries/transportation. Riskonnect covers driver risk via configurable workflow on the Salesforce-native data model. RiskWatch supports FMCSA via its assessment engine and survey-based controls but does not ship a dedicated CSA scoring engine; pair with Samsara, Lytx, or a DQ-file system if CSA scoring is the load-bearing requirement. Resolver, MetricStream, LogicGate, OnSolve / Crisis24, Everstream, Resilinc, and Sphera do not ship a dedicated driver-safety or CSA module; they cover DOT via configurable forms.
How do these platforms handle AEO certification for EU and UK customs compliance?
RiskWatch ships AEO control libraries pre-mapped alongside C-TPAT and ISO 28000 for shippers that hold US, EU, and UK customs-security certifications. MetricStream covers AEO via its broad regulatory content library. The other eight platforms cover AEO via configurable workflow rather than turnkey libraries. AEO is treated as the EU equivalent of C-TPAT under World Customs Organisation SAFE-Framework mutual recognition; buyers running both should choose a platform that cross-maps the two frameworks to avoid duplicate evidence collection. Cross-mapping is a first-class feature in RiskWatch; it is configurable in MetricStream, Resolver, and LogicGate; it requires custom build in the other six.
Are any of these platforms ITAR or EAR compliant for defence-logistics primes?
RiskWatch supports single-tenant deployment with US-only data residency and customer-owned data, which is the architectural foundation for ITAR-controlled and EAR-controlled defence-logistics primes running CMMC 2.0 or NIST 800-171. OnSolve carries FedRAMP authorisation for its mass-notification component, useful for federal-civilian and federal-defence logistics buyers. ServiceNow IRM in GovCommunityCloud (not in this top 10 because the brief is logistics not government) inherits FedRAMP High and DoD IL5 boundaries for federal-defence work. Riskonnect, Origami Risk, Resolver, MetricStream, LogicGate, Everstream, Resilinc, and Sphera are multi-tenant SaaS without a strong public ITAR claim. Confirm directly with each vendor before any defence-logistics commitment.
How often is this ranking re-verified?
We re-verify the ratings, pricing triangulations, and material vendor news on this page every quarter. The current pull is dated 2026-05-14. Pricing for opaque vendors is triangulated from two or more public third-party sources (SmartSuite, ITQlick, Vendr, GetApp, Capterra). Cargo-theft statistics reference the Verisk CargoNet 2025 Cargo Theft Trends release in January 2026. If a number on this page is stale when you read it, please file the correction at sales@riskwatch.com.
Definitions

Glossary

Definitions for the acronyms and jargon used on this page. Useful for sharing with non-specialist stakeholders on the buying committee.

C-TPAT
Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism. A voluntary US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) supply-chain security programme; certified importers, carriers, brokers, and 3PLs commit to a set of minimum security criteria and in return receive reduced examinations and faster cargo release. AEO is the EU equivalent under WCO SAFE-Framework mutual recognition.
TAPA FSR / TSR / PSR
Transported Asset Protection Association Facility Security Requirements, Trucking Security Requirements, and Parking Security Requirements. Industry-led standards for warehouse, in-transit, and parking-yard cargo security; widely required by Tier-1 high-value shippers in pharma, tech, and automotive. The TAPA EMEA Annual Conference 2026 is June 10-11 in Oberhausen, Germany.
AEO
Authorised Economic Operator. The EU customs-security equivalent of C-TPAT, awarded to economic operators (importers, exporters, carriers, brokers, warehouses) that meet a set of customs, security, and financial criteria. Mutual recognition agreements exist with US C-TPAT, China AA, Japan, and others under the WCO SAFE-Framework.
ISO 28000 / 28001
ISO 28000 is the international standard for security management systems for the supply chain (published 2007, revised 2022). ISO 28001 specifies the best practices for implementation. Pairs naturally with C-TPAT and TAPA because of overlapping control objectives; multi-certification shippers benefit from cross-mapping platforms like RiskWatch.
FMCSA CSA / DOT
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Compliance, Safety, Accountability programme. The US safety-measurement system for motor carriers, scoring carriers across seven BASICs (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories). DOT broadly covers Department of Transportation regulations including 49 CFR (HM-181 dangerous goods), driver-qualification files, and hours of service.
Motor-truck-cargo (MTC)
An insurance line covering cargo loss or damage while in the care, custody, or control of a motor carrier. Distinct from auto-liability (BI/PD), workers comp, and general liability. The 60% surge in 2025 cargo-theft losses (Verisk CargoNet $725M) has elevated MTC claims volume and average loss-per-claim; platforms like Riskonnect and Origami Risk ship dedicated MTC claims modules.
IMO ISPS Code
International Maritime Organisation International Ship and Port Facility Security Code. Mandatory for ships and port facilities in international trade; covers security plans, security officers, and facility-security assessments. Relevant for ocean carriers, port terminal operators, and freight forwarders handling marine cargo.
Final word

Which logistics platform should you pick?

If you read this page top to bottom and one platform stood out, that is your answer. The methodology is on this page so you can disagree with the rank and arrive at a different first pick honestly. We ranked RiskWatch #1 because the weights favour multi-framework supply-chain-security coverage (C-TPAT, TAPA, AEO, ISO 28000), examiner-defensibility, and pricing-transparency willingness; if your one job is high-volume motor-truck-cargo and auto-liability claims at a large carrier, Riskonnect or Origami Risk will rank higher on your matrix. If your one job is sub-tier-N supplier-graph visibility for a Tier-1 OEM, Everstream Analytics or Resilinc will rank higher.

The one thing every logistics buyer should do, regardless of which vendor wins your bake-off, is to insist on a 30-day working pilot with real shipment and claim data, a renewal-escalator cap in writing, and a documented exit clause. Six of the ten vendors here are PE-owned or PE-backed (Riskonnect, Sphera, MetricStream, LogicGate, OnSolve / Crisis24, Resolver) and historically carry 8-15% annual renewal pressure. The buyers we see lose three-year deals always lose them on those three terms, not on feature coverage. The 2025 cargo-theft surge (Verisk CargoNet $725M losses, 60% YoY, 3,594 events) has elevated board attention across this category, which is increasing vendor pricing power at renewal.

If you would like the RiskWatch logistics demo, sign up at riskwatch.com/request-a-demo. If you would like a no-strings second-opinion on one of the other nine, email sales@riskwatch.com with the vendor name in the subject line and we will share what we know.

Request a Demo