Case studyFortune 100: 80% less compliance workRead the Story
RiskWatch
Updated May 14, 2026 · 10 platforms evaluated

Top 10 Physical Security Software for Consulting Firms in 2026: A Buyer-First Ranking

Honest 2026 ranking of the 10 best physical security platforms for ASIS-aligned consulting firms. Scored on multi-client TVRA delivery, ASIS POA, branding, and value.

By RiskWatch Editorial · Physical Security and Consulting-Firm Software Research

Verdict

TL;DR

If you run an ASIS-aligned physical security consulting practice delivering TVRAs, ESRM advisory, and POA-grounded assessments to multiple client organisations, RiskWatch ranks first on our weighted score for the firm that wants 35+ pre-mapped libraries (ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards, NERC CIP-014, FEMA 426/452, NIST 800-30, ISC RMP, C-TPAT), per-client workspace isolation, white-label branded deliverables, four-feed crime-data overlay for defensible likelihood scores, and an offline mobile site-walk app the field team can run inside a substation. Circadian Risk is the strongest pure-play TVRA alternative when your firm writes its own templates and wants a cleaner first-run UX. Resolver fits security-consulting practices that need investigations and incident workflow in the same tenant as the assessment. AlertEnterprise, Ontic, and OnSolve / Crisis24 each cover a specific advisory niche (PIAM, protective intelligence, critical-event-management). Pick by per-client isolation model, branded-deliverable path, and engagement-billing fit, not by analyst-quadrant placement.

Pick by use case

Where each platform fits

Boutique ASIS-CPP security-consulting firms delivering TVRAs to 10-50 clients
RiskWatch: 35+ pre-mapped libraries (ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards, NERC CIP-014 R4/R5, FEMA 426/452, NIST 800-30, ISC RMP, C-TPAT); per-client workspace + customer-owned branded report templates; four-feed crime-data overlay for defensible likelihood; 30-day no-card trial.
Mid-market TVRA consultancies that author their own assessment templates
Circadian Risk: Pure-play physical security risk software with vulnerability-to-remediation workflow; arbitrary-standards template engine; multi-location dashboards; cleaner first-run UX than the heavier GRC platforms.
Security-consulting practices combining investigations, incidents, and TVRA
Resolver: Kroll-owned since March 2022; G2 Best Software Awards 2025 GRC honoree; strongest investigations and case-management workflow in the category; intelligence-led risk feeds for advisory engagements.
Identity-led advisory firms doing PIAM and access-governance assessments
AlertEnterprise: G2 Spring 2026 Grid Leader for Physical Security; deepest PIAM bench with Lenel S2 / Genetec Synergis / Software House CCURE / Honeywell ProWatch integration; Personal Risk Assessment workflow for utility / aerospace / healthcare advisory.
Protective intelligence consultancies delivering threat-to-person and executive-protection advisory
Ontic: Connected intelligence platform built for corporate security and protective intelligence teams; $40M Series C Dec 2023; CTM (Critical Threat Management) workflow that fits advisory firms doing threat assessment for high-net-worth principals and Fortune 500 executives.
Travel-risk and critical-event advisory linked to physical assessment
OnSolve (Crisis24): GardaWorld-acquired July 30 2024; AI-powered risk intelligence + mass notification + travel risk + duty-of-care advisory; right shape for consulting firms with ISO 31030 traveler-risk practices and dispersed-workforce clients.
Big-4 cyber-physical convergence advisory and large-PACS deployment partners
Convergint Smart Tools: Global integrator with offices in 30+ countries; 2024 Deloitte alliance for cyber-physical convergence and GSOC modernization; advisory-led assessment plus PACS deployment in one contract; Software House / Lenel S2 / Genetec / Avigilon expertise.
Integrator-channel consulting firms delivering Genetec deployments at airport / port / city scale
Genetec Security Center: Industry standard for unified VMS + Synergis access + AutoVu ALPR + intrusion; large global integrator and consulting partner network; published per-channel + per-door SaaS pricing simplifies advisory proposals.
Cloud-native consulting firms standing up Motorola Solutions / Avigilon deployments
Avigilon Alta: Motorola Solutions subsidiary; Alta launched 2023 combining Openpath access + Ava Aware video; cloud-native serverless architecture fits multi-client advisory rollouts; APX P25 radio + CommandCentral CAD adjacency for transit / public-safety advisory.
Lone-worker, travel-risk, and remote-site advisory firms
Aware360: SafetyAware platform for lone-worker monitoring + check-in + man-down + travel risk; right shape for consulting firms delivering Z1006 / ANSI Z1006 / ISO 45001 lone-worker programs to oil & gas, mining, utilities, and field-service clients.

Security-consulting firms have a different shape than the end-customers most physical security platforms are built for. An independent ASIS-CPP delivering 20 TVRAs a year for mid-market clients, a boutique security-consulting practice running ESRM advisory for 8 Fortune 500 customers, a Big-4 cyber-physical convergence team folding physical assessments into existing advisory engagements, and a protective intelligence consultancy handling executive-protection threat assessments for 30 high-net-worth principals all share the same primitives: many tenants delivered from one operating platform, per-client data isolation that survives client legal review (site diagrams and access logs are sensitive in their own right), a branded white-label deliverable the firm puts its own logo on, an audit trail strong enough for the client to re-derive the work, a crime-data overlay and benchmarking layer that gives likelihood scores credibility with insurers and boards, and an engagement-management workflow the firm can bill by. The ten platforms in this ranking each fit at least one of those briefs well; none of them fits all six equally.

We considered 22 platforms across the G2 Spring 2026 Grid for Physical Security, Capterra for security risk management, the ASIS Foundation vendor directory, the Big-4 advisory implementation-partner directories (Deloitte security practice, EY forensics, PwC cyber-physical, KPMG GRC), and Crunchbase + PitchBook for founding year, ownership, and recent funding. We cut to ten by removing pure-play body-worn cameras and patrol-management tools, removing VMS-only platforms with no advisory or consulting-channel story, removing single-tenant enterprise GRC platforms with no formal multi-client workspace model (Riskonnect, Archer), and removing integrators with no SaaS deliverable for the assessment workflow itself. The result is ten platforms a real ASIS-CPP security consultant or assessment-firm principal might shortlist in 2026.

Pricing transparency is poor in this segment. Eight of the ten platforms gate pricing entirely behind a demo. Genetec publishes Security Center SaaS pricing per channel and per door, and RiskWatch publishes partial contract bands on this page. Per-client pricing for consulting firms in 2026 typically falls in a band of $3,000 to $8,000 per client per year on the TVRA-first platforms, plus a base firm-tier licence of $12,000 to $40,000 per year. Full-suite enterprise platforms scale to $100,000 and above per engagement once PIAM or Crisis24-style critical-event-management is in scope. We triangulated each opaque vendor from at least two public third-party sources and dated each estimate to 2026-05-14. The methodology block at the bottom of this page spells out the weights and the conflict disclosure.

At-a-glance

Comparison table

The 10 platforms scored on the methodology weights at the bottom of this page. Pricing-transparency pill is the buyer-honesty signal.

RankProductBest forPricing transparencyG2Verdict
1RiskWatch
RiskWatch International
Boutique-to-mid-market ASIS-CPP / PSP / PCI security-consulting firms delivering ASIS-aligned TVRAs to 10-50 client organisations who want 35+ pre-mapped libraries, per-client isolation, crime-data overlay, and white-label deliverables on day one.Partial4.5/5
60+ reviews
35+ pre-built ASIS-aligned standards libraries on day one (ASIS Facility Physical...
2Circadian Risk
Circadian Risk, Inc.
Mid-market security-consulting firms (10-50 client engagements per year) who want a focused TVRA platform with strong remediation tracking and are willing to build their own ASIS / NERC CIP-014 / FEMA 426/452 standards templates.Opaque4.4/5
30+ reviews
Pure-play focus on physical security risk analysis, not a GRC bolt-on, so the workflow...
3Resolver
Resolver, a Kroll Business
Security-consulting practices that combine cyber, physical, investigations, and forensic work in the same client engagement; advisory firms with retail and consumer-brand customers tying incidents to risk register.Opaque4.3/5
200+ reviews
Strongest investigations and case-management workflow in the category; heritage from...
4AlertEnterprise
AlertEnterprise, Inc.
Cyber-physical convergence advisory practices, PIAM consultancies, and integrators delivering Lenel S2 / Genetec Synergis / Software House CCURE rollouts to utility, healthcare, airport, and Fortune 500 clients.Opaque4.5/5
40+ reviews
G2 Spring 2026 Grid Leader for Physical Security category
5Ontic
Ontic Technologies, Inc.
Protective intelligence consultancies, executive-protection advisory firms, insider-threat practices, and brand-protection retainers running named-subject threat assessment at scale.Opaque4.5/5
50+ reviews
Purpose-built for protective intelligence and corporate-security teams, which lines up...
6OnSolve (Crisis24)
Crisis24, a GardaWorld company
Advisory firms running ISO 31030 traveler-risk programs, duty-of-care engagements, and critical-event-management consultancy for dispersed-workforce and executive-travel clients.Opaque4.4/5
150+ reviews
Largest AI-powered risk intelligence feed in this ranking, combining GardaWorld field...
7Convergint Smart Tools
Convergint Technologies LLC
Integrator-channel consulting firms partnering with Convergint, Big-4 cyber-physical convergence practices, and clients buying a one-off enterprise security roadmap plus deployment in one contract.Opaquen/a
0+ reviews
Global service-based integrator with offices in 30+ countries, so a multi-national...
8Genetec Security Center
Genetec Inc.
Deployment-led consulting firms and integrators delivering large unified VMS + access + ALPR rollouts to airport, port, transit, retail, and city clients.Partial4.4/5
320+ reviews
Industry standard for unified VMS plus access control plus ALPR in one console, which...
9Avigilon Alta
Motorola Solutions
Consulting firms with Motorola Solutions client relationships, public-safety and transit advisory practices, and education / healthcare deployment-led engagements.Opaque4.3/5
200+ reviews
Cloud-native serverless architecture launched 2023 means lower IT-lift deployment for...
10Aware360
Aware360 Ltd.
Consulting firms delivering CSA Z1006, ANSI Z1006, and ISO 45001 lone-worker and travel-risk advisory to oil & gas, mining, utilities, and field-service clients.Opaque4.3/5
30+ reviews
Purpose-built lone-worker + travel-risk SaaS for the exact advisory workflow...
Calculator

Estimate the licence cost

Drag the slider to your headcount. Estimates use each vendor's published or triangulated tiers. Opaque vendors show Contact sales.

500
11.3k2.5k3.8k5k
RiskWatch
Consulting Professional (≤ 1,000 employees)
$36,000/yr
Circadian Risk
Consulting Mid-market (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
Resolver
Mid-market (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
AlertEnterprise
Guardian Express (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
Ontic
Mid-market (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
OnSolve (Crisis24)
Critical Event Management (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
Convergint Smart Tools
Risk assessment engagement (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
Genetec Security Center
Enterprise on-prem (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
Avigilon Alta
Alta Enterprise (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales
Aware360
Mid-market (est.) (quote-only tier)
Contact sales

Estimates only. Opaque-pricing vendors do not publish list prices; bands are triangulated from public third-party sources dated 2026-05-14. Implementation services, module add-ons, and renewal escalators are extra.

Pick your own weights

Decision matrix

Default weights match the methodology at the bottom of this page. Drag the sliders to match your priorities and re-rank in real time.

15%

How quickly a non-technical control owner reaches first value

25%

Module coverage across ERM, IT, audit, TPRM, BC

20%

Price to value ratio at mid-market

15%

Quality and responsiveness of vendor support

15%

Handling 5,000+ employees, multiple entities, regions

10%

Breadth of native connectors and APIs

Weights sum: 100%
  1. 1
    RiskWatch
    Editorial rank #1
    8.82
  2. 2
    Resolver
    Editorial rank #3
    8.34
  3. 3
    AlertEnterprise
    Editorial rank #4
    8.22
  4. 4
    Ontic
    Editorial rank #5
    8.11
  5. 5
    Circadian Risk
    Editorial rank #2
    8.04
  6. 6
    OnSolve (Crisis24)
    Editorial rank #6
    7.99
  7. 7
    Genetec Security Center
    Editorial rank #8
    7.88
  8. 8
    Avigilon Alta
    Editorial rank #9
    7.87
  9. 9
    Convergint Smart Tools
    Editorial rank #7
    7.66
  10. 10
    Aware360
    Editorial rank #10
    7.51
Switching cost

Migration matrix

Read row-to-column. Row = today's platform, column = tomorrow's. Colour reflects realistic switching effort, not vendor sales pitches.

From / To
RiskWatch
Circadian Risk
Resolver
AlertEnterprise
Ontic
OnSolve
Convergint Smart Tools
Genetec Security Center
Avigilon Alta
Aware360
RiskWatch.EMMEEMMEE
Circadian RiskM.MMEMHHEE
ResolverEE.EEEMEEE
AlertEnterpriseEEE.EEEEEE
OnticMEEE.EMMEE
OnSolveHEMMM.MMEE
Convergint Smart ToolsHMHHME.EEE
Genetec Security CenterHEMMMEE.EE
Avigilon AltaHEMMMEMM.E
Aware360HMHHHMMMM.
Easy (E)Moderate (M)Hard (H)Source: per-vendor migration field with radar-profile fallback. Treat as a directional guide, not a quote.
Methodology

How we scored and why you should trust it

The methodology is the only thing keeping this page honest. Read it carefully and apply your own weights in the decision matrix above.

RiskWatch published this ranking. RiskWatch accepts no affiliate fees, sponsorship money, or paid placements on this page. RiskWatch is also in the ranking, at #1. Readers should weigh that disclosure against the published evidence on this page; the methodology weights are calibrated for the multi-client security-consulting firm and the rank reflects fit against those weights, not absolute superiority. We scored each of the ten platforms on six axes weighted for the consulting-firm buyer: Feature Breadth covering ASIS POA / ESRM alignment, framework library count, crime-data overlay, multi-client workspace administration, and white-label deliverable path (25%); Value including per-client pricing transparency and renewal-escalator caps (20%); Ease of Use including the mobile field-assessment app and the time-to-stand-up-per-client (15%); Customer Support including partner-success programmes (15%); Scalability across the firm's client book (15%); and Integrations with VMS, PACS, crime-data feeds, and GIS (10%). Scores are 0-10 and calibrated within this category. Ratings reference G2 and Capterra figures pulled 2026-05-14. Pricing reflects the most-recent published or triangulated figures, also pulled 2026-05-14; where pricing is opaque we report a range based on two or more public third-party sources. We re-verify this page quarterly.

Weights used in the editorial ranking

Ease of use
15%
Feature breadth
25%
Value
20%
Customer support
15%
Scalability
15%
Integrations
10%
#1

RiskWatch

RiskWatch International · Founded 1993 · Annapolis, MD, USA

Multi-client TVRA platform with 35+ ASIS-aligned libraries and crime-data overlay for security-consulting firms.

Partial pricingG2 4.5 · Capterra 4.6 · 60+ reviews

Summary

RiskWatch ships a physical security risk assessment platform with 35+ pre-mapped libraries (ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards, ASIS POA-grounded control families, NERC CIP-014 R4 + R5, NIST 800-53 PE, NIST 800-30, FEMA 426 and 452, ISC RMP, OSHA, C-TPAT, NFPA 1600, ISO 28000) and supports per-client workspace administration for consulting firms delivering TVRAs to multiple client organisations. Likelihood pulls from four crime-data feeds (Cap Index CRIMECAST, Security Gauge, GlobalIncidentMap, World Aware) so consultant scores trace back to a sourced, dated data point. Deliverables can be exported under the consulting firm's branding and the platform has been in the field since 1993. Customers include Aon, Bose, Coca-Cola, Johnson and Johnson, Tennessee Valley Authority, and multiple US electric utilities running the NERC CIP-014 30-month cycle.

Strengths
  • 35+ pre-built ASIS-aligned standards libraries on day one (ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards + ASIS POA control families + NERC CIP-014 R4/R5 + FEMA 426/452 + NIST 800-53 PE + NIST 800-30 + ISC RMP + C-TPAT + OSHA + NFPA 1600), the deepest pre-mapped library set of any platform on this ranking
  • Four-feed crime-data overlay (Cap Index CRIMECAST, Security Gauge, GlobalIncidentMap, World Aware) gives every likelihood score a sourced, dated reference an insurer or client legal team can verify
  • Per-client workspace administration with single-tenant deployment option for consulting firms that need client-by-client data isolation for legal review
  • White-label branded report templates that the consulting firm can export under its own logo and methodology naming
  • Browser-based mobile TVRA that works offline at substations, perimeter areas, and remote campuses; syncs when cellular returns; no field findings lost
  • Site Risk Cycle with ISO 31000 and NIST 800-30 semi-quantitative scoring; findings convert to tracked tasks with owners and proof-of-close for the client team to action post-engagement
  • Average assessment drops from 31 hours to 8 hours per facility (internal RiskWatch benchmark across 200+ customer programs), which directly improves consulting-firm engagement margin
  • 30-day no-credit-card free trial with full platform access, the only TVRA-first vendor on this list offering it for a consulting firm to evaluate at pitch-stage
Weaknesses
  • No formal published Consulting Partner Programme tier-page; partner economics are negotiated case-by-case rather than published, which means firm principals have to ask for partner-tier pricing rather than reading it on the website
  • Public pricing is opaque; typical contract bands are published in the pricing calculator on this page but the partner-tier discount structure and per-client renewal-escalator cap are reserved for direct negotiation
  • Brand awareness on G2 and Capterra in physical-security consulting specifically is lower than Resolver or Genetec; combined review volume in the consulting-firm cohort sits below 100
  • Not a VMS, PACS, or PIAM platform; integrates with Genetec, Lenel S2, Avigilon, Milestone, and similar via APIs and bulk imports rather than ship deep native connectors for consulting firms delivering deployment alongside assessment
  • Less protective-intelligence (threat-to-person) depth than Ontic or OnSolve / Crisis24; the platform's centre of gravity is facility risk and TVRA, not executive-protection threat advisory
  • No native engagement-management or time-tracking module; firms that bill hourly layer a PSA (Kantata, ConnectWise, Mavenlink) on top rather than run it inside RiskWatch
Best for

Boutique-to-mid-market ASIS-CPP / PSP / PCI security-consulting firms delivering ASIS-aligned TVRAs to 10-50 client organisations who want 35+ pre-mapped libraries, per-client isolation, crime-data overlay, and white-label deliverables on day one.

Worst for

Single-engagement integrators delivering one-off VMS or PACS deployments where the brief is camera-and-door procurement rather than recurring multi-client TVRA software ownership; Genetec or Avigilon Alta is the better fit there.

Key features

  • Pre-built libraries for ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards, ASIS POA control families, NERC CIP-014 R4 + R5, NIST 800-53 PE, NIST 800-30, FEMA 426 and 452, ISC RMP, OSHA, C-TPAT, NFPA 1600, ISO 28000
  • Per-client workspace administration with single-tenant deployment option for client legal review
  • White-label branded report templates that export under the consulting firm's logo and methodology naming
  • Four-feed crime-data overlay (Cap Index CRIMECAST, Security Gauge, GlobalIncidentMap, World Aware) for defensible likelihood scoring
  • Browser-based mobile site walks that work offline and sync on reconnect
  • Cross-client benchmarking dashboards for firms that want anonymised peer-group reporting
  • Site Risk Cycle with per-site cadence, recommendation register, and proof-of-close
  • Board-ready report templates that pass an insurer, regulator, or client legal review

Integrations

25+ native. Notable: Microsoft Entra ID (SAML SSO), Okta, Microsoft 365 / SharePoint, Cap Index CRIMECAST, Genetec, Lenel S2, Avigilon, Milestone (API + bulk import), Jira, Custom REST API.

Target size

5 to 5,000 employees · US · Canada · EU · UK · AU

#2

Circadian Risk

Circadian Risk, Inc. · Founded 2016 · Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Pure-play physical security risk software with vulnerability-to-remediation workflow for consulting firms.

Opaque pricingG2 4.4 · Capterra 4.5 · 30+ reviews

Summary

Circadian Risk was founded in 2016 by Paul Mestemaker and Daniel R Young and built a SaaS platform purpose-built for physical security risk analysis. The product runs a proprietary score-based method comparing risks across sectors and locations, with strong vulnerability assessment and corrective action plan modules. Series A funding totals $11.3M and PitchBook places valuation at $22M as of September 2025. The platform is the right pick for a mid-market security-consulting firm that wants a clean TVRA workflow without the heavier GRC platform tax and is willing to author its own standards templates rather than rely on pre-built libraries.

Strengths
  • Pure-play focus on physical security risk analysis, not a GRC bolt-on, so the workflow lines up with how a security-consulting firm scopes an engagement
  • Strong vulnerability assessment to corrective action plan workflow with remediation tracking that consulting firms can hand back to the client team for ownership
  • Multi-location dashboard for risk and compliance status across client sites within a single engagement
  • Works with arbitrary standards templates so consulting firms that have a proprietary methodology can run it inside the platform
  • Cleaner first-run experience than the larger GRC platforms, which shortens consultant onboarding per engagement
Weaknesses
  • Smaller pre-built standards library than RiskWatch; consulting firms bringing ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards, NERC CIP-014, or FEMA 426/452 to a client engagement have to build the templates themselves rather than pull them off the shelf
  • No built-in crime-data feeds; likelihood is operator-scored rather than overlaid from third-party data, which is harder to defend in an insurer or client legal review
  • Pricing on request only; no public trial, no self-serve sign-up, and no published consulting partner tier
  • Series A company at $22M valuation; some enterprise client procurement teams want a vendor with 10+ years of operating history before signing 3-year multi-engagement deals
  • Smaller install base and review volume than the established TVRA and GRC players; harder for a consulting firm to point to enterprise reference customers when defending the platform choice to a Fortune 500 client
Best for

Mid-market security-consulting firms (10-50 client engagements per year) who want a focused TVRA platform with strong remediation tracking and are willing to build their own ASIS / NERC CIP-014 / FEMA 426/452 standards templates.

Worst for

Firms whose clients require pre-built NERC CIP-014, FEMA 426/452, or ASIS libraries on day one, or that require crime-data overlay rather than operator-scored likelihood; RiskWatch is the better fit.

Key features

  • Vulnerability assessment workflow with proprietary score-based method
  • Corrective action plan module with remediation tracking
  • Multi-location risk dashboard for engagement-level reporting
  • Arbitrary-standards template engine for proprietary consulting methodologies
  • Site-by-site risk comparison and benchmarking
  • Findings register with owner and due-date tracking
  • Configurable reporting for client board and executive readers
  • Web and mobile assessment capture

Integrations

15+ native. Notable: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, Microsoft Excel / CSV import, Custom REST API.

Target size

5 to 1,000 employees · US · Canada · UK

#3

Resolver

Resolver, a Kroll Business · Founded 2000 · Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Corporate-security suite with investigations + incidents + security risk in one tenant, sold into security-consulting practices.

Opaque pricingG2 4.3 · Capterra 4.3 · 200+ reviews

Summary

Resolver was founded in 2000 in Toronto and acquired by Kroll in March 2022. The platform sits at the intersection of corporate security, physical security, incident management, and investigations, which makes it the natural pick when a consulting firm's brief blends advisory work with forensic investigations or insider-threat work in the same client engagement. Resolver was named to G2's 2025 Best Software Awards in the GRC category and carries a 4.3/5 rating across 180+ reviews. Kroll ownership unlocks intelligence-led risk feeds that standalone TVRA vendors cannot match, which is useful for advisory firms doing protective intelligence alongside facility assessments.

Strengths
  • Strongest investigations and case-management workflow in the category; heritage from physical-security and corporate-security customers fits advisory firms with forensic practices
  • Kroll ownership unlocks intelligence-led risk feeds and global investigations support that standalone TVRA vendors cannot match
  • G2 Best Software Awards 2025 honoree in GRC; 4.3/5 across 180+ reviews
  • Mature multi-site security risk module aligned to ISO 31000 and ASIS ESRM, which lines up with the language consulting firms use when scoping ESRM advisory engagements
  • Strong threat-assessment and brand-protection use cases that map to retail and consumer-brand advisory engagements
Weaknesses
  • Pricing is opaque; no public tier and no self-serve trial; SelectHub and SmartSuite teardowns place mid-market consulting-firm deals in the $45-90K range
  • Setup and configuration is heavy; G2 reviewers consistently flag implementation effort as the most-cited downside, which adds time-to-stand-up-per-client cost for a consulting firm running greenfield engagements
  • UX has not had a generational rewrite; competitors with newer cloud interfaces (Drata, Hyperproof on the GRC side; Verkada on the VMS side) feel more modern on first run, which matters when the consulting firm hands the platform back to the client team
  • Pulled toward security-operations use cases; less natural fit for facilities-led TVRA programs that want pre-built ASIS libraries out of the box
  • Smaller pre-built physical-security standards library than RiskWatch; NERC CIP-014 and FEMA 426/452 require custom configuration rather than ship pre-mapped
Best for

Security-consulting practices that combine cyber, physical, investigations, and forensic work in the same client engagement; advisory firms with retail and consumer-brand customers tying incidents to risk register.

Worst for

Smaller facility-led security-consulting firms that want a pre-built ASIS library and a 30-day no-card trial; Resolver is overkill and the price reflects it.

Key features

  • Security risk register aligned to ISO 31000 and ASIS ESRM
  • Incident reporting and case management
  • Investigations workflow with chain-of-custody for advisory firms doing forensic work
  • Brand-protection and threat-assessment feeds (Kroll-powered)
  • Business continuity and operational resilience module
  • Configurable dashboards and multi-site rollup reports for engagement-level deliverables
  • Mobile incident reporting for guard force and frontline staff
  • Vendor and contractor risk module

Integrations

40+ native. Notable: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, ServiceNow, Splunk, Genetec, Lenel, Kroll intelligence feeds.

Target size

50 to 5,000 employees · US · Canada · UK · EU · AU

#4

AlertEnterprise

AlertEnterprise, Inc. · Founded 2007 · Fremont, CA, USA

Physical Identity and Access Management platform for advisory firms with PIAM and access-governance practices.

Opaque pricingG2 4.5 · Capterra 4.4 · 40+ reviews

Summary

AlertEnterprise Guardian is the category leader in Physical Identity and Access Management (PIAM), and was named a Leader in the G2 Spring 2026 Grid Report for Physical Security. The platform sits between HR systems, Active Directory, and Physical Access Control Systems (PACS) like Lenel S2, Genetec Synergis, Software House CCURE, and Honeywell ProWatch, enforcing access policies and running Personal Risk Assessment (PRA) checks. For consulting firms with identity-governance and access-policy advisory practices serving utilities, healthcare, aerospace, and Fortune 500 clients, AlertEnterprise is the deployment platform of choice. The centre of gravity is access governance rather than facility-level TVRA.

Strengths
  • G2 Spring 2026 Grid Leader for Physical Security category
  • Deepest PIAM integration with PACS (Lenel S2, Genetec Synergis, Software House CCURE, Honeywell ProWatch) of any platform on this list, which is critical for advisory firms delivering PIAM deployment alongside assessment
  • Personal Risk Assessment (PRA) workflow with automated policy enforcement and expiration alerts, used by advisory firms running NERC CIP-004 and CIP-006 advisory engagements
  • Fortune 500 customer base across utilities, healthcare, aerospace, and pharma is a credible reference set for an advisory firm pitching the platform to a similar client
  • GenAI-powered identity reconciliation across IT and OT environments differentiates the advisory pitch in cyber-physical convergence engagements
Weaknesses
  • Centre of gravity is identity and access governance, not facility-level TVRA; consulting firms doing ASIS-aligned TVRAs as the primary deliverable run them in RiskWatch or Circadian Risk and use AlertEnterprise alongside, not in place of
  • Pricing is enterprise-tier and opaque; no published list, typical deals are six-figure annual contracts, which makes it hard for a sub-Fortune-500 consulting practice to pitch profitably
  • Implementation is consultant-heavy; expect 90-180 day deployment with PACS integration scope, which is a feature for an integrator-led consulting firm and a bug for a firm that wants self-serve
  • Less crime-data-overlay capability than RiskWatch or OnSolve / Crisis24 for likelihood scoring
  • Smaller G2 review volume than the larger GRC and VMS platforms; reference-customer pool is narrower
Best for

Cyber-physical convergence advisory practices, PIAM consultancies, and integrators delivering Lenel S2 / Genetec Synergis / Software House CCURE rollouts to utility, healthcare, airport, and Fortune 500 clients.

Worst for

Mid-market security-consulting firms running facility TVRAs against ASIS, NERC CIP-014, or FEMA 426/452 who do not have an existing PACS estate to govern; the platform is over-built for that brief.

Key features

  • Physical Identity and Access Management (PIAM) with PACS integration
  • Personal Risk Assessment (PRA) workflow with policy enforcement
  • Blended threat detection across IT, PACS, and Industrial Control Systems
  • Visitor and contractor management
  • GenAI identity reconciliation across HR, AD, and OT directories
  • Compliance reporting for NERC CIP, HIPAA, SOX physical-access controls
  • Real-time policy enforcement with automated provisioning and de-provisioning
  • Audit-ready access certification workflow

Integrations

35+ native. Notable: Lenel S2 / OnGuard, Genetec Security Center, Software House CCURE, Honeywell ProWatch, Microsoft Active Directory, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors.

Target size

50 to 5,000 employees · US · Canada · UK · EU · APAC

#5

Ontic

Ontic Technologies, Inc. · Founded 2017 · Austin, TX, USA

Connected intelligence platform for protective intelligence and corporate-security advisory firms.

Opaque pricingG2 4.5 · Capterra 4.6 · 50+ reviews

Summary

Ontic was founded in 2017 in Austin and built the Connected Intelligence Platform purpose-built for corporate security, protective intelligence, and threat-management teams. The platform sits between OSINT feeds, internal incident data, watchlists, and case management to drive Critical Threat Management (CTM) workflow. For consulting firms running protective intelligence engagements (executive protection, threat-to-person assessments, insider-threat advisory, brand-protection retainers), Ontic is the deployment platform that lets the firm scale from one principal to fifty without re-tooling. The centre of gravity is threat-to-person and behavioural threat assessment, not facility-level TVRA, so it pairs alongside RiskWatch or Circadian Risk rather than replacing them.

Strengths
  • Purpose-built for protective intelligence and corporate-security teams, which lines up with how an executive-protection or threat-assessment consultancy scopes an engagement
  • Critical Threat Management (CTM) workflow with named-subject case-management is the right shape for advisory firms doing behavioral threat assessment at scale
  • $170M+ total raised gives the platform a stable funding runway and an active product roadmap; $40M Series C December 2023 led by JMI Equity
  • Strong OSINT and watchlist integrations that consulting firms can layer into client engagement deliverables
  • Used by Fortune 500 corporate-security teams, which gives an advisory firm a credible reference base when pitching to similar clients
Weaknesses
  • Not a TVRA or facility-assessment platform; no pre-built ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards, NERC CIP-014, or FEMA 426/452 libraries
  • Pricing is enterprise-tier and opaque; no public list, no self-serve trial, no published consulting-partner tier
  • Centre of gravity is threat-to-person and behavioural threat assessment; consulting firms that do not have a protective-intelligence practice will find the workflow misaligned to facility-risk engagements
  • Smaller G2 / Capterra footprint than the larger GRC or VMS platforms; harder for a consulting firm to triangulate the platform against a wide reference set
  • Implementation requires Ontic-led professional services for the OSINT and watchlist integration scope; not a lightweight stand-up
Best for

Protective intelligence consultancies, executive-protection advisory firms, insider-threat practices, and brand-protection retainers running named-subject threat assessment at scale.

Worst for

Facility-led TVRA consulting firms running ASIS or NERC CIP-014 assessments; Ontic is not the workflow.

Key features

  • Connected Intelligence Platform
  • Critical Threat Management (CTM) workflow
  • Named-subject case management for executive-protection and threat-to-person engagements
  • OSINT feeds with curated watchlist integrations
  • Incident, alerts, and investigation workflows
  • Behavioral threat assessment scoring
  • Configurable dashboards for advisory firm and client-side reporting
  • Mobile case app for field officers and consultants

Integrations

30+ native. Notable: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, ServiceNow, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Workday, Public OSINT feeds.

Target size

50 to 5,000 employees · US · Canada · UK · EU

#6

OnSolve (Crisis24)

Crisis24, a GardaWorld company · Founded 2017 · Alpharetta, GA, USA

Critical event management, mass notification, and travel-risk advisory under the Crisis24 umbrella.

Opaque pricingG2 4.4 · Capterra 4.5 · 150+ reviews

Summary

OnSolve was acquired by GardaWorld on July 30 2024 and integrated into the Crisis24 business, combining critical event management, mass notification, incident management, travel risk, and AI-driven risk intelligence in one platform. For consulting firms running ISO 31030 traveler-risk programs, duty-of-care advisory, and dispersed-workforce critical-event-management engagements, OnSolve / Crisis24 is the right deployment platform. The combined GardaWorld global field operations footprint plus Crisis24 OSINT feed gives a consulting firm a credible advisory product to sell alongside facility-risk work. The platform is not a TVRA workflow; assessment is layered alongside, not delivered inside.

Strengths
  • Largest AI-powered risk intelligence feed in this ranking, combining GardaWorld field operations with Crisis24 OSINT, which gives an advisory firm a unique product to sell into client engagements
  • Mass notification at scale (multi-channel: SMS, voice, email, mobile app, desktop) used by consulting firms standing up duty-of-care programs for dispersed-workforce clients
  • Travel risk and duty-of-care workflow under ISO 31030 alignment, which is the load-bearing standard for traveler-risk advisory engagements
  • Strong integration with the broader GardaWorld global security operations footprint for advisory firms that need on-the-ground field support to back up the platform
  • Continuous threat-feed updates rather than periodic assessment cadence, which differentiates the advisory pitch versus quarterly TVRA-only competitors
Weaknesses
  • Not a TVRA platform; no pre-built ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards, NIST 800-30, FEMA 426/452, or NERC CIP-014 libraries
  • Acquisition integration ongoing post-July 2024; product roadmap and brand alignment between the legacy OnSolve product line and the broader Crisis24 platform is still in flux, which adds vendor-stability risk for consulting firms signing 3-year deals
  • Opaque pricing; enterprise-tier deals typical, no self-serve trial, no published consulting partner tier
  • Less facility-level multi-site assessment rollup than RiskWatch or Resolver; consulting firms running facility-led engagements run them elsewhere
  • Centre of gravity is threat-to-people and critical events, not physical infrastructure risk scoring, so it pairs with rather than replaces a TVRA platform
Best for

Advisory firms running ISO 31030 traveler-risk programs, duty-of-care engagements, and critical-event-management consultancy for dispersed-workforce and executive-travel clients.

Worst for

Facility-led TVRA consulting firms running ASIS or NERC CIP-014 assessments; the platform is not built for that workflow.

Key features

  • AI-powered risk intelligence feed
  • Mass notification across multiple channels
  • Incident management with playbooks
  • Travel risk and duty-of-care workflow under ISO 31030
  • Global Security Operations Centre access (Crisis24 SOC)
  • Geospatial threat-to-asset mapping for advisory engagements
  • Mobile app for traveller check-in and SOS
  • Integration with HR and travel-booking systems

Integrations

40+ native. Notable: Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Concur, Microsoft Entra ID, Slack, Microsoft Teams, ServiceNow.

Target size

100 to 50,000 employees · Global

#7

Convergint Smart Tools

Convergint Technologies LLC · Founded 2001 · Schaumburg, IL, USA

Global integrator advisory + assessment + deployment delivered through Convergint Smart Tools.

Opaque pricing

Summary

Convergint was founded in 2001 and is one of the largest service-based security integrators globally, with offices in 30+ countries. Convergint Smart Tools is the suite of digital advisory + assessment + deployment tools the firm uses on engagements. A 2024 alliance with Deloitte expanded the cyber-physical security convergence offering, and the company integrates Software House, Lenel S2, Genetec, Avigilon, and Honeywell. Convergint is the right pick when a buyer wants advisory-led assessment plus large-PACS deployment in one contract; it is the wrong pick for an independent ASIS-CPP consulting firm that wants to own its own software stack rather than work inside an integrator's tooling.

Strengths
  • Global service-based integrator with offices in 30+ countries, so a multi-national advisory engagement can be staffed from a single contract
  • Physical security risk assessments delivered as advisory professional services with Convergint Smart Tools as the digital backbone
  • 2024 Deloitte alliance for cyber-physical security convergence and GSOC modernization, which is the right shape for Big-4 advisory engagements
  • Strong PACS deployment expertise: Software House CCURE, Lenel S2 OnGuard, Genetec, Avigilon, Honeywell ProWatch
  • Single-contract scope for assessment, design, deployment, and managed services means a consulting firm partnering with Convergint can offer a one-stop pitch to large clients
Weaknesses
  • Not a standalone software product for independent consulting firms; assessment is delivered inside a Convergint engagement, not licensed for the firm to operate alone
  • No platform an independent consulting firm can log into between Convergint engagements; findings live in Convergint-owned deliverables and follow-up SOWs
  • Service-engagement pricing model means no per-site recurring TVRA workflow that an independent consulting firm can resell on its own contract
  • Cyber-physical convergence depth comes from the Deloitte alliance and PACS-vendor relationships rather than first-party software
  • Independent consulting firms competing with Big-4 / integrator-led engagements will find the platform shape misaligned to a boutique advisory book
Best for

Integrator-channel consulting firms partnering with Convergint, Big-4 cyber-physical convergence practices, and clients buying a one-off enterprise security roadmap plus deployment in one contract.

Worst for

Independent ASIS-CPP consulting firms that want to own and operate their own multi-client TVRA software stack; Convergint Smart Tools is shaped for Convergint engagements, not external firm operation.

Key features

  • Physical security risk assessment as professional service
  • Convergint Smart Tools digital assessment backbone
  • Enterprise security roadmap creation
  • PACS design and deployment (Software House, Lenel S2, Genetec, Avigilon, Honeywell)
  • Global Security Operations Centre modernization
  • Cyber-physical convergence (Deloitte alliance)
  • Touchless access control deployment
  • Service-led managed security operations

Integrations

100+ native. Notable: Software House CCURE, Lenel S2 OnGuard, Genetec Security Center, Avigilon, Honeywell ProWatch, AlertEnterprise Guardian.

Target size

100 to 50,000 employees · Global

#8

Genetec Security Center

Genetec Inc. · Founded 1997 · Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Unified VMS + access control + ALPR + intrusion deployed through a global consulting partner network.

Partial pricingG2 4.4 · Capterra 4.6 · 320+ reviews

Summary

Genetec Security Center is the industry standard for unified physical security platforms, tying video surveillance, access control, automatic licence plate recognition, and intrusion into one console. For consulting firms with deployment-led practices (airport, port, city-wide surveillance, large retail, transit), Genetec is the platform of choice because the global integrator and consulting partner network is the deepest in the category. Genetec now publishes Security Center SaaS pricing per channel and per door, which simplifies advisory proposals and partner-tier discount conversations. The platform is not a TVRA workflow; assessments are auxiliary and require third-party tools or RiskWatch alongside.

Strengths
  • Industry standard for unified VMS plus access control plus ALPR in one console, which is the default platform on most large-deployment advisory engagements
  • Deepest global integrator and consulting partner network in the category gives consulting firms ready access to deployment muscle
  • Strong analytics across video, badge, and licence-plate data for advisory engagements doing data-driven security maturity assessments
  • Security Center SaaS now publishes per-channel and per-door pricing, giving consulting firms a defensible budget figure to put in front of clients
  • Large active customer base in airports, large retail, transit, and city-wide surveillance programs is a credible reference set for advisory pitches
Weaknesses
  • Not a TVRA or assessment platform; assessment workflows are auxiliary and require third-party tools (RiskWatch, Circadian Risk) for consulting firms running ASIS-aligned engagements
  • No pre-built ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards, NIST 800-30, FEMA 426/452, or NERC CIP-014 question libraries
  • Hardware and licensing complexity; per G2 and Capterra reviewers costs scale significantly with channel and door counts, which complicates a consulting firm's client proposal
  • Learning curve for new operators; multi-site administration becomes complex as estate grows, which adds time-to-stand-up cost per client engagement
  • Plug-in interfacing could be more robust per G2 reviewer commentary
Best for

Deployment-led consulting firms and integrators delivering large unified VMS + access + ALPR rollouts to airport, port, transit, retail, and city clients.

Worst for

TVRA-first consulting firms running ASIS or NERC CIP-014 assessments; Genetec does not ship the libraries or the workflow.

Key features

  • Unified video management (Omnicast)
  • Access control (Synergis)
  • Automatic Licence Plate Recognition (AutoVu)
  • Intrusion detection
  • Analytics across video, badge, and LPR data
  • Mobile operator app for guard force and supervisors
  • Federated multi-site architecture
  • Hardware-agnostic integration framework

Integrations

200+ native. Notable: Axis Communications, Bosch, HID Global, Mercury Security, AlertEnterprise Guardian, Microsoft Entra ID, ServiceNow.

Target size

100 to 50,000 employees · Global

#9

Avigilon Alta

Motorola Solutions · Founded 2004 · Vancouver, BC, Canada (Motorola Solutions HQ: Chicago, IL, USA)

Cloud-native unified video + access for Motorola Solutions consulting and integrator channels.

Opaque pricingG2 4.3 · Capterra 4.5 · 200+ reviews

Summary

Avigilon Alta is Motorola Solutions' cloud-native unified physical security platform, launched 2023 combining Openpath access control (acquired July 2021) with Ava Aware video (acquired August 2021). The platform sits inside the broader Motorola Solutions portfolio, which includes APX P25 radio, CommandCentral CAD, and the legacy Avigilon Unity on-prem line. For consulting firms with public-safety, transit, education, and healthcare practices that already work with Motorola, Alta is the deployment platform that fits inside the existing radio + CAD + camera relationship. The advisory pitch is unified Motorola; the workflow is video + access, not TVRA.

Strengths
  • Cloud-native serverless architecture launched 2023 means lower IT-lift deployment for multi-client consulting rollouts
  • Motorola Solutions backing (NYSE: MSI) gives the platform enterprise-grade stability and a deep public-safety integration story
  • APX P25 radio + CommandCentral CAD adjacency makes Alta the default video + access pair for transit, public-safety, and emergency-services advisory practices
  • Open ONVIF support for multi-vendor camera estates lets consulting firms run mixed legacy + cloud deployments inside one tenant
  • Avigilon AI analytics (Appearance Search, Unusual Activity Detection) heritage is a credible deliverable for advisory firms doing video-data maturity assessments
Weaknesses
  • Not a TVRA or assessment platform; no pre-built ASIS, NIST 800-30, FEMA 426/452, or NERC CIP-014 question libraries
  • Two product families (Alta cloud + Unity on-prem) means a consulting firm has to position the client-fit conversation carefully or risk pitching the wrong stack
  • Pricing is opaque; no public list, per-camera and per-door scaling reserved for integrator-channel quotes
  • Cloud-native architecture is a strength for greenfield and a weakness for clients with brownfield on-prem estates that need a hybrid-deployment story
  • Cybersecurity scrutiny on cloud VMS platforms generally is elevated post-Verkada-2021-incident, which adds procurement friction for federal-aviation and DIB advisory clients
Best for

Consulting firms with Motorola Solutions client relationships, public-safety and transit advisory practices, and education / healthcare deployment-led engagements.

Worst for

TVRA-first consulting firms running ASIS or NERC CIP-014 assessments; Alta is a VMS + access platform, not an assessment workflow.

Key features

  • Cloud-native unified VMS (Alta Aware)
  • Cloud-native access control (Alta Access, formerly Openpath)
  • Mobile credentials with Bluetooth and wave-to-unlock
  • AI-powered video analytics (Appearance Search, Unusual Activity Detection)
  • Open ONVIF support for multi-vendor camera estates
  • Mobile operator app for guard force and supervisors
  • APX P25 radio + CommandCentral CAD integration for public-safety customers
  • Unity on-prem option for hybrid deployments

Integrations

40+ native. Notable: Motorola APX P25 radio, Motorola CommandCentral CAD, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, Google Workspace, ServiceNow, Splunk.

Target size

100 to 50,000 employees · Global

#10

Aware360

Aware360 Ltd. · Founded 1999 · Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Lone-worker + travel-risk SaaS for consulting firms delivering Z1006 / ISO 45001 advisory.

Opaque pricingG2 4.3 · Capterra 4.4 · 30+ reviews

Summary

Aware360 was founded in 1999 in Calgary and built the SafetyAware platform for lone-worker monitoring, check-in, man-down detection, and travel-risk awareness. For consulting firms delivering CSA Z1006 (working alone), ANSI Z1006, ISO 45001 occupational-safety, and lone-worker safety advisory to oil & gas, mining, utilities, field-service, and remote-workforce clients, Aware360 is the deployment platform that supplements the TVRA. The product is not a facility-assessment workflow; it pairs alongside a TVRA platform when the engagement scope includes a lone-worker or travel-risk program. Consulting firms in oil & gas, mining, and utility verticals use it because the platform is purpose-built for the exact workflow.

Strengths
  • Purpose-built lone-worker + travel-risk SaaS for the exact advisory workflow consulting firms deliver under CSA Z1006 / ANSI Z1006 / ISO 45001
  • Oil & gas, mining, utilities, and field-service customer base aligned to the verticals where lone-worker programs are a regulator-mandated deliverable
  • Check-in, man-down detection, and panic-button workflow that consulting firms can hand back to the client safety team post-engagement
  • 25+ years of operating history (founded 1999) means consulting firms can defend the vendor choice to risk-averse industrial procurement teams
  • Mobile-first SafetyAware app fits the field-worker brief without an IT-led deployment process
Weaknesses
  • Not a TVRA platform; no pre-built ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards, NIST 800-30, FEMA 426/452, or NERC CIP-014 libraries
  • Narrow advisory fit; consulting firms without a lone-worker or industrial-safety practice will not get the use out of the platform
  • Pricing is opaque; no public list, no self-serve trial, and no published consulting-partner tier
  • Smaller G2 / Capterra footprint than the larger physical-security platforms; harder for a consulting firm to triangulate the platform against a wide reference set
  • Centre of gravity is lone-worker and travel-risk; advisory firms doing facility-led TVRA work run it alongside, not in place of, a TVRA platform like RiskWatch or Circadian Risk
Best for

Consulting firms delivering CSA Z1006, ANSI Z1006, and ISO 45001 lone-worker and travel-risk advisory to oil & gas, mining, utilities, and field-service clients.

Worst for

Facility-led TVRA consulting firms whose client engagements do not include a lone-worker or remote-workforce safety scope.

Key features

  • SafetyAware lone-worker mobile app
  • Check-in / check-out scheduled workflow
  • Man-down detection and panic-button alerting
  • Travel-risk awareness with geofence triggers
  • 24/7 monitoring centre escalation
  • Configurable dashboards for client safety teams
  • GPS and indoor location tracking
  • Integration with HR and ERP systems

Integrations

20+ native. Notable: Microsoft Entra ID, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, ServiceNow, Garmin inReach satellite, Custom REST API.

Target size

25 to 5,000 employees · US · Canada · UK · AU

Step by step

Buying guide

Walk these steps in order. The shortlist falls out of step 1, the negotiation moves come together in step 6, and step 8 closes the deal.

  1. 1

    Name the consulting-firm engagement shape in one sentence

    Before you shortlist, write down what your firm actually delivers. Examples: facility TVRAs against ASIS for mid-market clients; NERC CIP-014 R4 / R5 unaffiliated third-party review for electric utilities; PIAM advisory plus deployment for utility / aerospace clients; executive-protection threat assessments for high-net-worth principals; ISO 31030 traveler-risk programs for dispersed-workforce clients. The shortlist falls out of the answer.

  2. 2

    Sort the 10 platforms by engagement shape

    Facility TVRA delivery filters in RiskWatch (#1 for boutique-to-mid-market firms with pre-built ASIS libraries) and Circadian Risk (#2 for firms authoring their own templates). Mixed cyber-physical-investigations advisory filters in Resolver. PIAM deployment plus advisory filters in AlertEnterprise. Protective intelligence advisory filters in Ontic. Travel-risk and critical-event advisory filters in OnSolve / Crisis24. Big-4 cyber-physical convergence filters in Convergint Smart Tools. Large-PACS deployment advisory filters in Genetec and Avigilon Alta. Lone-worker advisory filters in Aware360. Read the 3-4 cards that match your engagement shape; skip the rest.

  3. 3

    Verify per-client isolation and white-label deliverable on day one

    Ask each vendor to show you the per-client workspace administration screen, the data-isolation model (single-tenant per client, multi-tenant with SOC 2 isolation, or multi-tenant with no isolation), and the white-label branded report template export. Consulting firms that skip this verification step always pay for it later when a client legal team objects to multi-tenant data residency or insists on the firm's logo on the deliverable.

  4. 4

    Pressure-test the ASIS POA, ESRM, and Facility Standards library on screen

    If your engagement scope runs against ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards, ASIS POA control families, NERC CIP-014 R4 / R5, NIST 800-53 PE, FEMA 426 / 452, or ISC RMP, ask each vendor to show you the library on screen during the demo. Pre-built means pre-mapped controls and pre-scored question banks. Vendors who promise to build it for you after signing are charging you for a configuration project that should already be done.

  5. 5

    Pressure-test the crime-data overlay and benchmarking story

    Defensible TVRA likelihood scores trace back to a sourced, dated data point. RiskWatch overlays four crime-data feeds (Cap Index CRIMECAST, Security Gauge, GlobalIncidentMap, World Aware) and supports cross-client benchmarking out of the box. Other platforms either rely on operator-scored likelihood (Circadian Risk) or pull threat-feed data shaped for protective intelligence (Ontic, Crisis24) rather than facility risk. Pick the one that matches what your insurer and client boards will accept.

  6. 6

    Insist on a working pilot, not a demo

    Demos are choreographed. Working pilots are not. Ask each finalist for a 30-day pilot with your real data: two client workspaces, one framework each, one mobile site walk per client, one auditor-export per client. The platform that handles your data and your branded deliverable workflow without three weeks of professional services is the one that will scale post-deal. RiskWatch publishes a 30-day no-card trial; other vendors require a structured POC.

  7. 7

    Ask for the consulting-partner-tier discount structure and renewal-escalator cap in writing

    Renewal-pricing pressure is the silent budget killer. PE-owned vendors (Resolver via Kroll, Convergint, Avigilon Alta via Motorola Solutions) historically signal 6-15% annual uplift pressure. Ask for the consulting-partner-tier discount structure (not just the list price), the renewal-escalator cap in the master subscription agreement, and the per-client exit clause. Walk if the vendor refuses to put these in writing.

  8. 8

    Pressure-test the data-residency and exit clause

    Physical security data includes site diagrams, access logs, and findings registers that are sensitive in their own right. Ask each vendor: where does each client's data live, who can access it, what happens to it when the engagement ends? RiskWatch supports single-tenant deployment with customer-owned data residency for federal and NERC CIP-014 clients. Most SaaS-first vendors are multi-tenant; that is fine if the SOC 2 report holds up and the per-client isolation model is documented. Get the exit clause in writing.

Frequently asked

Buyer questions, answered

The eight questions our pre-sales team hears the most often when buyers compare this category.

What does a security-consulting firm actually need from physical security software?
Six load-bearing primitives. First, per-client workspace administration with data isolation strong enough for client legal review (site diagrams and access logs are sensitive). Second, ASIS POA / ESRM / Facility Physical Security Control Standards alignment so the methodology language matches the consulting deliverable. Third, a white-label branded deliverable path that exports under the consulting firm's logo. Fourth, a crime-data overlay and benchmarking layer that makes likelihood scores defensible to insurers and client boards. Fifth, an offline mobile field-assessment app that works at substations, perimeter areas, and remote campuses. Sixth, engagement-billing economics that line up with how the firm bills clients. RiskWatch ranks #1 on this page because it covers all six on day one.
Which platforms support multi-client TVRA delivery for boutique security-consulting firms?
RiskWatch publishes per-client workspace administration with single-tenant deployment for client legal review and a Consulting Professional tier that supports unlimited client workspaces. Circadian Risk supports multi-location dashboards inside a single tenant and is the strongest alternative for firms willing to build their own templates. Resolver handles multi-tenant via module-by-module configuration but is heavier to stand up per engagement. Genetec, AlertEnterprise, Avigilon Alta, Convergint Smart Tools, OnSolve / Crisis24, Ontic, and Aware360 are not designed for multi-client TVRA delivery as a primary workflow; they pair alongside a TVRA platform for advisory firms with a specialist engagement scope.
How does ASIS POA, ESRM, and Facility Physical Security Control Standards alignment differ across these platforms?
RiskWatch ships ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards and ASIS POA-grounded control families as pre-built libraries on day one, plus ASIS ESRM alignment in the Site Risk Cycle methodology. Resolver aligns its security-risk module to ASIS ESRM and ISO 31000 by configuration. Circadian Risk supports ASIS through its arbitrary-standards template engine but does not ship the libraries pre-mapped. AlertEnterprise aligns to ASIS ESRM in PIAM policy enforcement. Ontic, OnSolve / Crisis24, Genetec, Avigilon Alta, Convergint, and Aware360 do not ship ASIS-aligned assessment libraries; consulting firms running ASIS-aligned engagements layer those workflows on a TVRA-first platform.
Which platforms include crime-data overlay and cross-client benchmarking for consulting firms?
RiskWatch is the only platform in this ranking that ships four-feed crime-data overlay (Cap Index CRIMECAST, Security Gauge, GlobalIncidentMap, World Aware) plus cross-client benchmarking dashboards out of the box, which is the load-bearing requirement for a consulting firm that needs defensible likelihood scores in client deliverables. OnSolve / Crisis24 ships a curated AI-powered risk intelligence feed that pairs alongside facility risk scoring. Ontic ships OSINT and watchlist feeds for protective-intelligence engagements. The remaining seven platforms rely on operator-scored likelihood, third-party feed pass-through, or no native crime-data overlay at all.
How should an ASIS-CPP security consultant budget for the platform in 2026?
For a boutique ASIS-CPP firm delivering 10-25 client engagements per year, expect $18K-$36K per year on a TVRA-first platform like RiskWatch (Consulting Starter or Consulting Professional tier) plus $3K-$8K per client in per-client implementation and template work. For a mid-market practice running 25-50 engagements, $36K-$60K per year on the platform plus 15-25% implementation. For a Big-4 cyber-physical convergence practice, the platform spend is dwarfed by the PACS deployment scope and the conversation shifts to Convergint Smart Tools, AlertEnterprise, or Genetec with a TVRA platform alongside. Always model 3-year TCO and ask for the renewal-escalator cap in writing.
Does RiskWatch replace AlertEnterprise, Ontic, or OnSolve / Crisis24 for advisory firms?
No. RiskWatch is the assessment, scoring, reporting, and audit-trail layer for facility-led TVRAs. AlertEnterprise governs identity and access across PACS estates. Ontic runs named-subject protective-intelligence threat assessment. OnSolve / Crisis24 runs critical-event-management, mass notification, and traveler-risk advisory. Consulting firms with mixed engagement scopes run RiskWatch alongside one or more of those platforms depending on the client brief, not in place of them.
How does the data-residency conversation work for consulting firms with US federal and NERC CIP-014 clients?
RiskWatch supports single-tenant deployment with customer-owned data residency for federal and NERC CIP-014 clients, which is a frequent procurement requirement when the consulting firm is engaged as an unaffiliated third-party reviewer under CIP-014 R4 / R5. Resolver supports multi-tenant SaaS with documented SOC 2 isolation but not customer-owned residency by default. Circadian Risk runs multi-tenant SaaS. AlertEnterprise supports dedicated-tenant deployments for utility customers. Genetec, Avigilon Alta, OnSolve / Crisis24, Ontic, and Aware360 are multi-tenant SaaS with SOC 2 isolation. Get the exit clause and data-residency model in writing before signing a multi-engagement deal.
Does RiskWatch accept any money from the other vendors on this page?
No. RiskWatch accepts no affiliate fees, sponsorship money, or paid placements on this page. RiskWatch is also on the page, at #1. That conflict is disclosed inline on the RiskWatch product card and in the methodology block. Readers should weigh that disclosure against the published evidence on this page.
Definitions

Glossary

Definitions for the acronyms and jargon used on this page. Useful for sharing with non-specialist stakeholders on the buying committee.

TVRA
Threat, Vulnerability, and Risk Assessment. The periodic facility-level program that scores threats against vulnerabilities and produces a treatment plan. RiskWatch, Circadian Risk, and Resolver are TVRA-first or TVRA-capable platforms in this ranking.
ASIS POA
ASIS Protection of Assets. The reference manual published by ASIS International that codifies the body of knowledge for physical security practice. Consulting firms grounded in ASIS POA expect their assessment platform to reference the same control families.
ASIS ESRM
ASIS Enterprise Security Risk Management. The 2019 ASIS Guideline that establishes an enterprise-wide framework for managing security risk. ESRM-aligned consulting engagements expect the platform to support ESRM scoring methodology.
ASIS Facility Physical Security Control Standards
The ASIS standard that defines a set of physical security controls for facility risk assessments. RiskWatch ships this as a pre-built library on day one; other platforms in this ranking support it via custom configuration.
Multi-client workspace
An administrative model in which a consulting firm operates one platform tenant that contains many client workspaces, each with its own data, users, branding, and audit trail. RiskWatch publishes Consulting Starter / Professional / Enterprise tiers organised around this model.
Crime-data overlay
A likelihood-scoring layer that pulls third-party crime data (Cap Index CRIMECAST, Security Gauge, GlobalIncidentMap, World Aware) into the assessment so likelihood scores are defensible to insurers and client boards. RiskWatch is the only platform in this ranking that ships four feeds.
White-label branded deliverable
An assessment report exported under the consulting firm's own logo and methodology naming rather than the platform vendor's brand. RiskWatch and Circadian Risk support this; Genetec, Avigilon Alta, AlertEnterprise, and OnSolve / Crisis24 do not because their deliverables are operational dashboards rather than periodic reports.
Final word

Which consulting-firm platform should you pick?

If you read this page top to bottom and one platform stood out, that is your answer. The methodology is on this page so you can disagree with the rank and arrive at a different first pick honestly. We ranked RiskWatch #1 in the boutique-to-mid-market security-consulting segment because the methodology weights favour ASIS-aligned framework breadth, per-client isolation, crime-data overlay, and white-label deliverable path; if your firm runs Big-4 cyber-physical convergence engagements at integrator scale, Convergint Smart Tools and AlertEnterprise will rank higher on your matrix and we said so on those cards. If your firm runs protective-intelligence advisory for high-net-worth principals, Ontic will rank higher. If your firm runs ISO 31030 traveler-risk programs, OnSolve / Crisis24 will rank higher.

The one thing every security-consulting firm should do, regardless of which vendor wins your bake-off, is to insist on a 30-day working pilot per engagement type, the consulting-partner-tier discount structure in writing, a renewal-escalator cap, and a documented per-client exit clause that your client legal teams can review. Three of the ten vendors here are PE-owned or controlled by larger public parents (Resolver via Kroll, Convergint via Leonard Green and Ares, Avigilon Alta via Motorola Solutions) and historically carry 6-15% annual renewal pressure pulled through to partner economics. The advisory firms we see lose three-year partner agreements always lose them on those terms, not on feature coverage.

If you would like the RiskWatch consulting-firm partner conversation, sign up at riskwatch.com/request-a-demo and put "consulting firm enquiry" in the subject line. If you would like a no-strings second-opinion on one of the other nine, email sales@riskwatch.com with the vendor name in the subject line and we will share what we know.

Request a Demo